Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Pratikgiri Rameshgiri Goswami vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 10 August, 2015

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

                   C/SCA/12577/2015                                               ORDER



                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12577 of 2015
                                               With
                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12578 of 2015
                                                TO
                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12592 of 2015
         ==========================================================
                     PRATIKGIRI RAMESHGIRI GOSWAMI....Petitioner(s)
                                      Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR PA JADEJA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MS SHRUTI PATHAK, AGP ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the
         Respondent(s) No. 1 in Special Civil Application No.12577/2015; Special Civil
         Application No.12581/2015; Special Civil Application No.12585/2015; and
         Special Civil Application No.12589/2015.

         MR ROHAN YAGNIK, AGP ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the
         Respondent(s) No. 1 in Special Civil Application No.12578/2015; Special Civil
         Application No.12582/2015; Special Civil Application No.12586/2015; and
         Special Civil Application No.12590/2015.

         MR SWAPNESHWAR GOUTAM, AGP ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP
         for the Respondent(s) No. 1 in Special Civil Application No.12579/2015;
         Special Civil Application No.12583/2015; Special Civil Application
         No.12587/2015; and Special Civil Application No.12591/2015.

         MR RUTVIJ OZA, AGP ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the
         Respondent(s) No. 1 in Special Civil Application No.12580/2015; Special Civil
         Application No.12584/2015; Special Civil Application No.12588/2015; and
         Special Civil Application No.12592/2015.
         ==========================================================

                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
          
                                        Date : 10/08/2015 
                                      COMMON ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3

HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Fri Aug 14 11:58:30 IST 2015 C/SCA/12577/2015 ORDER

1. It is the case of the petitioners that they are all working as adhoc  Lecturers  and  Assistant   Professors  in   the  Government   Diploma/Degree  Engineering   Colleges.   They   have   been   appointed   on   adhoc   basis   for   a  period of 11 months. They have learnt through the reliable source that  the Director of Technical Education is to be issued an advertisement for an  appointment of adhoc Lecturers/Assistant Professors for a period of 11  months. It is their case that in this manner, the adhoc employees are  being   replaced   by   another   set   of   adhoc   employees.   According   to   the  petitioners, such a course of action is not permissible in law in view of  the decision of the Court in the case of  'Pradeep Navinbhai Patel and  Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.'  reported in  2014 (2) GLH 501  as  well   as   the   judgment   of   the   Division   Bench   in   the   case   of  'State   of  Gujarat  & Anr. Vs.  Jain Sumit Rajeshbhai and  Ors.',  Letters Patent  Appeal No.1046 of 2014; decided on 18.02.2015.

2. Ms. Pathak, the learned AGP has opposed the issue of notice in  this bench of petitions on the premise that no advertisement till this date  has been issued. No cause of action can be said to have been arisen so as  to   maintain   these   writ­applications.   According   to   Ms.   Pathak,   the  apprehension   has   no   basis   and   no   petition   can   be   filed   on   mere  apprehension.

3. Let  Notice   be   issued  to   the   respondents   returnable   on  08.09.2015. Till the next date of hearing, the services of the petitioners  shall   not   be   terminated.   To   put   it   in   other   words,   they   shall   not   be  replaced by another set of adhoc employees. 

It is clarified that if the respondents want to undertake a regular  recruitment   process,     it   shall   be   open   for   them   to   do   so   and   if   such  regular recruitment process is undertaken, it shall also be open for the  petitioners to apply pursuant to the same.

Page 2 of 3

HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Fri Aug 14 11:58:30 IST 2015 C/SCA/12577/2015 ORDER Direct service is permitted.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)  aruna Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Fri Aug 14 11:58:30 IST 2015