Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Ex 7119107 Cfn P Philip vs Union Of India on 3 July, 2025

Author: Amit Rawal

Bench: Amit Rawal

                                       1
R.P. No.751 of 2025
                                                        2025:KER:49266

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

                                       &

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

   THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2025 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1947

                             RP NO. 751 OF 2025

          AGAINST     THE   JUDGMENT   DATED   29.05.2025   IN   W.P.(C)

NO.34421 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

              EX 7119107 CFN P PHILIP
              AGED 65 YEARS
              S/O P PAPPACHAN KOTTAPURATH HOUSE,
              KAYAMKULAM P 0 ALLEPPEY DIST ICT,
              KERALA, PIN - 690552


              BY ADV SHRI.I.YOHANNAN

RESPONDENTS:

      1       UNION OF INDIA
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
              SOUTH BLOCK, NEW D ELHI, PIN - 110011

      2       UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
              DEPARTMENT OF EX-SERVICEMEN WELFARE D (PEN/LEGAL)
              MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK,
              NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011

      3       THE CHIEF OF THE ARMY STAFF
              INTEGRATED HEAD QUARTERS OF MOD (ARMY) SOUTH BLOCK,
                                 2
R.P. No.751 of 2025
                                                 2025:KER:49266

              NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011

      4       SENIOR RECORD OFFICER
              EME RECORDS, SECUNDERABAD 21,
              PIN - 500021

      5       PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS)
              OFFICE OF THE PCDA (P),DRAUPATIGARH,
              ALLAHABAD, PIN - 211014


OTHER PRESENT:

             SRI S BIJU

     THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.07.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                   3
R.P. No.751 of 2025
                                                     2025:KER:49266

           AMIT RAWAL & MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
          ---------------------------------------------------
                         RP No.751 of 2025
          ---------------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2025


                               ORDER

Muralee Krishna S., J.

By the judgment dated 29.05.2025, this Court allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioner herein in part. Now, the petitioner approached this Court with the above review petition filed under section Order XLI Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, pointing out that there is an error apparent on the face of record in the operative portion of the judgment.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents.

3. From the submissions made at the Bar, we notice that an inadvertent typographical error occurred in paragraph 15 of the judgment as well as in the relief portion. In the judgment, by analysing the rival contentions of the parties concerned, we found that the petitioner is entitled for invalid pension. But, instead of 4 R.P. No.751 of 2025 2025:KER:49266 granting that relief, in paragraph 15 as well as in the relief portion of the judgment, reassessment of disability by a medical board was happened to be directed due to a clerical error. Therefore, the review petition is allowed by correcting the judgment dated 29.05.2025 passed in W.P.(C)No.34421 of 2024 as under;

(i) Delete the sentences starting from the word 'provided' till the word 'Board' occurring in line numbers 5 to 9 of paragraph 15 of the judgment.

(ii) Substitute the 'coma' with 'full stop' after the word 'pension' in the 5th line of paragraph 15.

(iii) Delete the relief portion starting from the word "In the result" till the words "7% per annum" and substitute therein "In the result, the writ petition is allowed and the competent among the respondents are directed to issue a PPO, granting invalid pension to the petitioner at the rate entitled by him with arrears for a period of three years prior to the filing of the original application before the tribunal, at the earliest, at any rate, within a period three months from 5 R.P. No.751 of 2025 2025:KER:49266 the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, failing which the unpaid arrears would carry interest at 7% per annum."

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE Sd/-

MURALEE KRISHNA S., JUDGE MSA