Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 9]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S Sandvik Asia Ltd on 28 July, 2015

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI
COURT NO. II


APPEAL NO. E/2529/06-Mum

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. PII/BKS/110/2006 dated 19.04.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune-II.)

For approval and signature:							    Honble Shri Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial)
Hon'ble Shri Raju, Member (Technical) 

=====================================================

1. Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see : No the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?

2. Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the : Yes CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?

3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : Seen of the order?

4. Whether order is to be circulated to the Departmental : Yes authorities?

===================================================== Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II Appellant Vs. M/s Sandvik Asia Ltd.

Respondent Appearance:

Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Supdt. (A.R.) for Appellant None for Respondent CORAM:
SHRI ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SHRI RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Date of Hearing: 28.07.2015 Date of Decision: 28.07.2015 ORDER NO.  Per: Anil Choudhary:
This appeal is filed by the Revenue. The amount involved is less than Rs. 5,00,000/-.
2. Keeping in view the fact that the amount involved is less than Rs. 5,00,000/- and as per the litigation policy of the Government vide Boards letter F. No. 390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17.08.2011 read with Hon'ble Gujarat High Courts judgments in the case of CCE, Surat-I Vs. Shreenath Fabrics reported in 2014 (303) ELT 540 (Guj.) and in the case of CCE, Vadodara-I Vs. Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2014 (306) ELT 153 (Guj.) and the judgment of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE, Bangalore-III Vs. Presscom Products reported in 2011 (268) ELT 344 (Kar.), the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed without going into the merits of the case.

(Pronounced in open Court) (Raju) (Anil Choudhary) Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) Sp 2