Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Ramalingam vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 20 October, 2022

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                                       W.P.No.22000 of 2018

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 20.10.2022

                                                         CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                 W.P.No.22000 of 2018

                     S.Ramalingam                                                  ... Petitioner

                                                             Vs.

                     1.State of Tamil Nadu
                       Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                       Home Department,
                       Secretariat,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Director General of Police,
                       Beach Road,
                       Mylapore,
                       Chennai – 600 004.

                     3.The Superintendent of Police,
                       CBCID,
                       Chennai.                                                    ... Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records relating to
                     proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A1/07262/2018 dated 15.05.2018 and quash the
                     same consequentially direct the Respondents to sanction 10% of basis pay as
                     special pay to the petitioner along with the eligible interest.



                     Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      W.P.No.22000 of 2018

                                        For Petitioner           : Mr.A.R.Nixon

                                        For Respondents          : Mr.S.Rajesh
                                                                   Government Advocate

                                                           ORDER

The order of rejection, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner in proceedings dated 15.05.2018 is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner is a retired Sub-Inspector of Police and retired on 31.01.2010. The petitioner states that he worked under CBCID Crime Branch between 2004 to 2007 as Head Constable. Thereafter, he served in the Crime Branch Criminal Intelligence Department in Organised Crime Unit (in City) Branch and thereafter, promoted as Sub-Inspector of Police.

3. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that 10% of Basic Pay as Special Pay as permissible was not granted to the petitioner in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.667, Home (POL-8) Department dated 14.08.2009. Thus, the petitioner submitted a representation and the Superintendent of Police has written a letter to the Director General of Police stating that the said Special Pay was not granted to the Police personnel serving in Crime Branch. Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22000 of 2018

4. Perusal of the Government order issued in G.O.Ms.No.667, Home (POL-8) Department dated 14.08.2009, reveals that 10% of Basic Pay as Special Pay is granted only to SBCID personnel and it was not granted to the Branch in which the petitioner served. The Government ordered 10% of Basic Pay to be sanctioned as Special Pay to the cadres from the Police Constable to the level of Additional Superintendent of Police and Non-I.P.S. Superintendent Police serving in the SBCID, SBCID Special Division, Security Branch CID, “Q” Branch CID, Core Cell CID, Special Branch Assistants and Shorthand Bureau Staff with effect from 01.08.2009.

5. When the Government order categorically stipulates the eligibility for grant of 10% of Basic Pay as Special Pay, rejection of claim of the writ petitioner is in consonance with the Government policy and there is no infirmity as such.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

20.10.2022 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order / Non-speaking order Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22000 of 2018 To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director General of Police, Beach Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

3.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Chennai.

Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22000 of 2018 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Jeni W.P.No.22000 of 2018 20.10.2022 Page 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis