Himachal Pradesh High Court
Pradesh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 28 June, 2022
Bench: A.A. Sayed, Tarlok Singh Chauhan
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 28th DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.A. SAYED, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4144 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
MANSO DEVI WIFE OF LATE
LAYAK RAM, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE
PANOG, SUB TEHSIL RONHAT,
DISTRICT
TEHSIL SHILLAI,
DISTRICT SIRMAUR, HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
(BY SH. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
THROUGH SECRETARY
(EDUCATION) TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH, SHIMLA2
2. DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION, HIMACHAL
PRADESH, SHIMLA1.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,
SIRMAUR AT NAHAN, DISTRICT
SIRMAUR, HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2022 20:03:02 :::CIS
2
4. BLOCK ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION OFFICER, SHILLAI,
DISTRICT SIRMAUR, HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
.
5. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY,
GRAM PANCHAYAT PANOG,
TEHSIL SHILLAI, DISTRICT
SIRMAUR, HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
6. SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR
THE POST OF PART TIME
MULTI TASK WORKER FOR
GOVERNMENT PRIMARY
SCHOOL PANOG THROUGH ITS
CHAIRMANCUMSUB
DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
SHILLAI, DISTRICT SIRMAUR,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
7. SHRI KEDAR SINGH SON OF
SHRI JEET SINGH, RESIDENT
OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE
PANOG, SUB TEHSIL ROHNAT,
TEHSIL SHILLAI, DISTRICT
SIRMAUR, HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SH. ADARSH K. SHARMA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE
GENERAL, FOR THE RESPONDENTSSTATE)
This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble
Mr. Justice A.A. Sayed passed the following:
ORDER
::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2022 20:03:02 :::CIS
3
The petitioner, who is seeking appointment on the post of Multi Task Worker in Government Primary School, Panog, .
Education Block Shillai, District Sirmaur, is aggrieved by the marks allotted to her in the Scheme titled as "Part Time Multi Task Worker Policy, 2020". The case of the petitioner is that she is entitled to eight (8) marks as she belongs to the same ward and further that the marks have wrongly been awarded to respondent No. 7. It is submitted the petitioner has already made a representation (Annexure P4) to the respondents.
2. In these circumstances, we dispose of the petition by directing respondent No. 6 to decide the representation of the petitioner after hearing the petitioner as well as respondent Nos. 5 and 7.
3. In the event of result are not already declared, the same shall not be declared until the representation is decided.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(A. A. Sayed) Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge June 28, 2022 Kalpana/Sanjeev ::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2022 20:03:02 :::CIS