Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Smt.Radhabai B.Shirke (Decd.Thr.Lrs) ... vs Keshav Ramchandra Jadhav ... on 18 January, 2023

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

                                                                       18-IA-384-2023.doc
     Sonali


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
       Digitally
       signed by                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2023.01.18
                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 384 OF 2023
       17:17:20
       +0530                                       IN
                                       SECOND APPEAL NO.593 OF 1987


                    Smt. Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke
                    since deceased through legal heirs
                    and representatives
                    1. Sau. Kanchan Pralhad Shinde & Ors.               ...Applicants
                        Versus
                    Keshav Ramchandra Jadhav
                    since deceased through legal heirs
                    and representatives
                    Mrs. Nameeta Manoj Pawar & Ors.                     ...Respondents

                    Mr. Uday B. Nighot, for the Applicants.

                    Mr. Siddharth Shitole, i/b. Mr. Sarthak Diwan, for Respondent No.1.

                    Mr. R. D. Soni a/w. Mr. Eknath K. Dongardive, i/b. Ram & Co., for
                    Respondent No.2.

                    Mr. Abhijit Kadam, for Respondent No.3.


                                            CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 18th JANUARY 2023 P.C. :

1. This Interim Application is taken out for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased Appellant No.2. There is delay of 186 days in filing the application.
1/2

18-IA-384-2023.doc Sonali

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respective Respondents strongly opposes the application.

3. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c).

4. Amendment be carried out within a period of three weeks from today.

5. The Interim Application is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 2/2