Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Chattisgarh High Court

Suresh Kumar Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 87 Wps/1273/2018 ... on 8 February, 2018

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                               1

                                                                                    NAFR
                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                  WPS No. 1270 of 2018

             Suresh Kumar Pandey S/o Late Lalji Pandey, aged about 45 years, R/o
             Boraidadar Chowk, Near Vinoba Nagar, P.S.Raigarh, Tehsil and District
             Raigarh (C.G.).
                                                                          ---Petitioner
                                               Versus
       1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Urban
          Administration & Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur,
          Revenue & Civil District Raipur (C.G.).
       2. Municipal Corporation Raigarh, Through Commissioner, Raigarh,
          Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (C.G.).
                                                                      ---Respondents

For petitioner : Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For respondent No.1/State : Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

For respondent No.2 : Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/02/2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the petitioner in the instant case has been regularized for a period of two years vide order dated 15/10/2015 and though two years have already lapse, no order has further been passed by the respondents.

2. The counsel for the petitioner prays that an appropriate directions be given to the respondent No.2 in this regard, considering the representation made by the petitioner seeking for confirmation of regularization.

3. At this juncture, without entering into the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the petition is disposed off 2 with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the case of the petitioner and to pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the service conditions of the petitioner so far as confirming their regularization.

4. It is expected that the authorities would take a decision expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days.

5. The Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/-

                                                            (P. Sam Koshy)
Sumit                                                           JUDGE