Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Manjula Alex vs State Of Kerala on 9 February, 2012

Author: M.Sasidharan Nambiar

Bench: M.Sasidharan Nambiar

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

         THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/20TH MAGHA 1933

                         BA.No. 167 of 2012 ()
                         ---------------------

     (CRIME NO.133/2011 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA)


PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
-----------------------

         MANJULA ALEX
         AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. ALEXANDER
         KIZHAKKEPARAMBIL VEEDU, PADARATHIL PADI MURI
         NEDUBRAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMATHITTA.


         BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------

     1  STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.


         BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR K K RAJEEV

       THIS BAIL APPLICATION  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON  09-02-
2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:



                 M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J
             ..................................................
                        B.A.No.167 of 2012
             ..................................................
                    Dated 9th February, 2012


                                 ORDER

Petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No. 133 of 2011 of Koipuram Police Station registered for the offences under Section 143, 147, 148, 120B, 452, 326 and 308 read with 149 of IPC. Petitioner was arrested on 6.12.2011 and has been in custody since then.

2. Though petitioner earlier sought bail, by Annexure B order dated 23.12.2011, it was dismissed holding that investigation is at the initial stage and if petitioner is released, it would adversely affect the investigation.

3. As petitioner has been in custody since 6.12.2011, I do not find that further detention of the petitioner is necessary for the investigation. If presence of the petitioner could be assured and his non-interference in the investigation is ensured and his fleeing from justice is ba 167/12 2 prevented, there is no need to further detain him.

4. Release the petitioner on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Pathanamthitta on the following conditions.

i) Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Wednesday between 10 and 12 am for two months and thereafter as and when required.
ii)Petitioner shall not induce, threaten or intimidate any person from disclosing facts known to him to the Investigating Officer or to the court.
iii)Petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the learned Magistrate and if he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect before the learned Magistrate.

In view of the contention that petitioner is a member of a quotation gang, petitioner shall not enter within the jurisdiction of Koipuram Police Station, except for complying ba 167/12 3 with the direction given earlier without the permission of learned Magistrate.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk