Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Smart Asset Services India Pvt. Ltd vs Trishul Developers on 16 March, 2026

     ITEM NO.18                                   COURT NO.12                             SECTION IV-A

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                   I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                   No.    9559/2026

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-02-2026
     in WP No. 6807/2025 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at
     Bengaluru]

     SMART ASSET SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     TRISHUL DEVELOPERS & ORS.                                                            Respondent(s)

     FOR ADMISSION AND IA No. 78869/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

     Date : 16-03-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN


     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv.
                                           Mr. Tushar Ajinkya, Adv.
                                           Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, AOR
                                           Mr. Ankit Acharya, Adv.
                                           Ms. Ritu Chaudhary, Adv.
                                           Mr. Ayush Jain, Adv.
                                           Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv.
                                           Mr. Yogesh, Adv.
                                           Mr. Sahil Bijliwala, Adv.
                                           Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                     Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv.
                                           Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv.
                                           Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AOR


                              UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

We find no good ground and reason to interfere with the Signature Not Verified impugned Digitally signed by babita pandey Date: 2026.03.17 judgment/order, as the High Court merely remanded the 17:21:59 IST Reason:

matter for consideration of certain aspects. 1 Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents on advance notice/caveat states, on instructions, that pending the examination of the matter pursuant to the remand, no further third-party interests would be created in the unsold flats without the leave of the Court.
Recording the aforesaid statement, the special leave petition is disposed of.
Given the nature of the matter and the interests of the parties, we would request the Civil Court concerned at Bengaluru, Karnataka, to expedite, to the extent possible, the hearing of the matter pursuant to the remand order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
 (BABITA PANDEY)                                               (PREETI SAXENA)
    AR-cum-PS                                                 COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                           2