Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Madan Lal vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 23 January, 2024

Author: Harsimran Singh Sethi

Bench: Harsimran Singh Sethi

                                                            Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:008396




CM-20488-CWP-2023 in/and
CWP-26475-2016             2024:PHHC:008396 1
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                     AT CHANDIGARH

(107)                              CM-20488-CWP-2023 in/and
                                   CWP-26475-2016
                                   Date of Decision : January 23, 2024


Madan Lal                                                     .. Petitioner


                                   Versus

State of Haryana and others                                   .. Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:       Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.

               Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)

CM-20488-CWP-2023 Present application has been filed for recalling the order dated 12.10.2023 (Annexure A-1).

Notice of the application to the counsel opposite. Mr. Harish Nain, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He raises no objection for the grant of prayer as raised in the present application.

Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the order dated 12.10.2023 is recalled.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing today itself.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2024 01:23:56 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:008396 CM-20488-CWP-2023 in/and CWP-26475-2016 2024:PHHC:008396 2 CWP-26475-2016

1. In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that earlier service rendered by him in HSMITC should be taken into consideration for the grant of ACP along with arrears and further consequential benefits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which has been raised in the present writ petition, has already been raised by the petitioner in his legal notice dated 25.08.2016, a copy of which has been appended with this petition as Annexure P-10 and the petitioner will be satisfied at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said legal notice by passing an appropriate speaking order.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that question of law raised in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court while deciding CWP No.24308 of 2016 titled as Prithvi Pal Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 01.10.2018 and the legal notice of the petitioner will be decided in light of the said development.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.

5. Ordered accordingly.


January 23, 2024                 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
harsha                                  JUDGE


            Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
            Whether reportable       : Yes/No


Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:008396 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2024 01:23:57 :::