Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Shushil Shailesh Agarwal vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 22 December, 2016

                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                         Club Building (Near Post Office)
                       Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                              Tel: +91-11-26101592

                                                     File No. CIC/CC/C/2014/000003/BS/11960
                                                                          21 December 2016
Relevant Facts emerging from the Complaint:

Complainant                            :      Mr. Sushil Shailesh Agarwal
                                              C/o 1182, Katiyar bhavan,
                                              Tubewell Road, Khatibaba,
                                              Jhansi - 284 001, Uttar Pradesh

Respondent                             :      CPIO/ ITO (HRD) (CMD)
                                              CBDT
                                              Directorate of Income Tax, HRD
                                              ICADR Building, Plot no 6,
                                              Vasant Kunj, Institutional area Phase - II
                                              New Delhi - 110070

RTI application dated                  :      25/04/2014
PIO reply dated                        :      03/05/2014
Complaint dated                        :      09/08/2014

Information sought

:

1. What are the Rules and procedure for Promotion and Departmental Examination relating to MTS cadre in the Income Tax Department if any and provide a copy thereof.
2. Is there a requirement of minimum number of years of service for promotion to next subsequent post and if yes, then how many years and on what basis.
3. The next subsequent post to which a MTS can be promoted upon fulfilling the qualifications determined by the Board and its pay scale and Grade pay.
4. When MTS is a Group C post then why its Grade Pay is 1800 and is it corresponding to minimum Grade Pay of Group C posts as fixed by 6th Pay Commission.

Grounds for the Complaint:

The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing held on 30/11/2016:
The following were present Complainant: Absent Respondent: Mr. Malkiat Singh CPIO/ITO (HRD) The applicant has sent a mail stating that he is appearing in an examination and has requested for adjournment.
Interim Decision notice dated 30/11/2016:
The matter is adjourned for 21/12/2016 at 03.00 PM.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Complainant: Absent Respondent: Mr. Malkiat Singh CPIO/ITO (HRD) Page 1 of 2 The CPIO produced copy of e-mail dated 03/12/2016 sent by the applicant stating that he has received the information and is satisfied.
Decision Notice:
Information has been provided to the applicant and he is satisfied.
The matted is closed.
BASANT SETH Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:
(R. L. Gupta) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer Page 2 of 2