Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Ram Chandra Hansdah vs Principal Commissioner on 5 December, 2024

Bench: Arindam Sinha, M.S. Sahoo

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                               W.P.(C) No.29925 of 2024
            Ram Chandra Hansdah                    ....              Petitioner

                                                     Represented By Adv. -
                                                Mr. S.A. Mohanty, Advocate
                                        -versus-

            Principal Commissioner, CGST           ....       Opposite Parties
            and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar
            and another
                                                    Represented By Adv. -
                                        Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel

                                 CORAM:
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
                                           AND
                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
                                          ORDER

05.12.2024 Order No.

01.

1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 23rd December, 2022 followed by order dated 13th January, 2023 cancelling his client's registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client's Page 1 of 2 // 2 // claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

2. Mr. Kedia, learned advocate, Junior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the department.

3. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).

"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner's invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner's application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.

4. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Signature Not Verified Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Jyoti Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 05-Dec-2024 14:49:31 Page 2 of 2