Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Chikahombamma vs The Secretary on 6 September, 2012

Bench: Dilip B.Bhosale, S.N.Satyanarayana

                            1


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

        DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012

                        PRESENT

         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

                           AND

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA

                   WPHC.NO. 172/2012


BETWEEN

SMT. CHIKAHOMBAMMA
W/O. KRISHNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESIDENT OF H.NO.95
ARAGINAMELE, KOPPA HOBLI
MADDUR TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT                        ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVIGOUDAR, ADV.,)


AND

1. THE SECRETARY
   DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS
   VIDHANA SOUDHA
   BANGALORE - 1

2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
   OF POLICE
   GOVT. OF KARNATAKA
   NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
   BANGALORE - 1

3. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF
   POLICE
   MANDYA DISTRICT
   MANDYA
                                2


4. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF
   POLICE
   MYSORE DISTRICT
   MYSORE

5. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE
   TUMKUR DISTRICT
   TUMKUR

6. THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR
   NAGAMANGALA POLICE STATION
   MANDYA DISTRICT                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.H.S. CHANDRAMOULI, SPP) WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO PRODUCE THE PETITIONER'S BROTHER BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT.

THIS WPHC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

PC:
By this Habeas Corpus writ petition, the petitioner is seeking production of his brother before the Court, who according to her has been illegally detained by the respondents.
Mr.Chandramouli, learned SPP, on instruction, submits that the respondents have arrested the brother of the petitioner on 5.9.12 in connection with the theft and they have registered a case bearing Crime No.154/12 for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC. His statement is recorded and 3 accepted and in view thereof, this petition renders infructuous and disposed of as such.
Disposal of the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioner from approaching the concerned court for appropriate relief.
SD/-
JUDGE SD/-
JUDGE TL