Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Anil vs Maneesh Garg & Others on 8 December, 2022

Author: Sandeep Sharma

Bench: Sandeep Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.267 of 2022 Date of Decision: 8.12.2022 .

_______________________________________________________ Anil .......Petitioner Versus Maneesh Garg & others ... Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Assistant Advocate General.
_______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 7th December, 2022, issued under the signature of Director Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General submits that Government has decided vide communication dated 2.12.2022, copy whereof is annexed with the aforesaid communication, to implement the order/judgment dated 9th May, 2022 subject to outcome of the SLP.

2. Perusal of aforesaid communication as well as copy of order dated 7.12.2022, issued under the signature of Under Secretary, Elementary Education, to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, this Court finds that judgment alleged to have been violated has been duly complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings.

1

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2022 20:33:33 :::CIS 2

3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings and some are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly.

.

Consequential benefits pursuant to implementation of the judgment, shall be released in favour of the petitioner forthwith, failing which, petitioner is at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law is taken against erring official.

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge 8th December, 2022 (shankar) ::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2022 20:33:33 :::CIS