Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Birenbhai Rasikbhai Amin & vs Rameshbhai Bhulabhai Vaghri & ... on 5 August, 2014

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

         C/CRA/255/2014                                ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 255 of 2014
================================================================
           BIRENBHAI RASIKBHAI AMIN & 1....Applicant(s)
                            Versus
        RAMESHBHAI BHULABHAI VAGHRI & 11....Opponent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR TATTVAM K PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 2
================================================================
        CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA
               KUMARI

                          Date : 05/08/2014
                            ORAL ORDER

Heard   Mr.Tattvam   K.   Patel,   learned   advocate   for  the applicants.

It   is   submitted   that   the   registered   Sale   Deeds  challenged   by   respondent   No.1­original   plaintiff   in  the   suit   are   of   the   years   1989   and   2006,   which   are  clearly barred by law of limitation. It is submitted  that the registration of a Sale Deed is deemed to be  constructive   knowledge   of   the   execution   thereof,   as  held by this Court in  Kanjibhai   Bhagwanjibhai   Patel  Vs.   Nanduben   Shamjibhai   Sorathiya   through   P.O.A.,  Dharmesh P. Trivedi and others,  reported in 2013 (1)  GLR 51 and Becharbhai Zaverbhai Patel and another Vs.  Jashbhai Shivabhai Patel and others, reported in 2013  Page 1 of 2 C/CRA/255/2014 ORDER (1) GLR 398.

It is further submitted that one of the prayers  made   in   the   plaint   is   regarding   the   issuance   of   a  declaration to the effect that defendants Nos.3 and 4,  who have been wrongly declared as agriculturists, are  not actually agriculturists. According to the learned  advocate for the applicants, this prayer is barred by  Section­85   of   the   Bombay   Tenancy   and   Agricultural  Lands Act, 1948.

Issue Notice returnable on 02.09.2014. Ad­interim   relief   in   terms   of   paragraph­6(c)   is  granted, till then.   

(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) Gaurav+ Page 2 of 2