Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sanjay Sejwal vs State Of Haryana on 17 September, 2019

Author: Anupinder Singh Grewal

Bench: Anupinder Singh Grewal

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                   CHANDIGARH


 239                               CRM-M-23666-2019

                                   DATE OF DECISION: 17.09.2019

SANJAY SEJWAL                                  ... Petitioner(s)


                            Versus

STATE OF HARYANA                               ... Respondent(s)


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present:    Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

            Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana.

            Mr. Nihul Pratap Singh, Advocate for the complainant.

                    *****

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.199 dated 20.04.2019 under Sections 406 & 506 IPC (Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC added subsequently), registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, Faridabad.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations in the FIR are that the complainant is alleged to have deposited a sum of Rs.27,50,000/- in the account of the petitioner as advance for setting up set top boxes and other ancillary activities connected therewith. It is also alleged that the petitioner after having accepted the money did not perform his part of the obligation.

A coordinate Bench of this Court, by the order dated 23.05.2019, had directed the petitioner to appear and deposit the 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 03-10-2019 02:59:48 ::: CRM-M-23666-2019 -2- disputed amount before the trial Court and on his doing so, he was to be released on ad-interim bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court on 28.05.2019 and on depositing the entire amount, he had been granted interim bail in terms of the order dated 23.05.2019 of the coordinate Bench of this Court.

In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner having appeared before the trial Court, the order dated 23.05.2019 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court as and when called upon to do so. He shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

The petition stands disposed of.

(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 17.09.2019.

SwarnjitS



              Whether speaking/reasoned   :      Yes / No
              Whether reportable          :      Yes / No




                                 2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 03-10-2019 02:59:48 :::