Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.Stanley Buck vs The Land Commissioner (Land Reforms) on 14 October, 2022

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian, T.V.Thamilselvi

                                                                                       W.A.No.1271 of 2013

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 14.10.2022
                                                         CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                   AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                    W.A.No.1271 of 2013
                                                           and
                                                   C.M.P.No.9191 of 2020

                     1.P.Stanley Buck

                     2.P.Sethu Ammal                                                       ...Appellants

                                                            Vs.

                     1.The Land Commissioner (Land Reforms),
                       Chepauk, Chennai.

                     2.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       Land Reforms, Erode – 638 001.

                     3.A.K.Parvathammal                                                  ..Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Amended Letters Patent,
                     1862, against the order passed in W.P.No.8140 of 2004 dated 07.06.2011.
                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.Naveen Aravindan for
                                                                  Mr.V.Adith Narayan
                                  For Respondents     : Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan
                                                       Additional Government Pleader for R1 &R2

                     1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.A.No.1271 of 2013



                                                    JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) Mr.Naveen Aravindan representing the learned counsel for the appellants would state that they have given change of vakalat. It is seen that no new counsel had entered appearance. Therefore, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

2.The learned counsel on record is to inform the appellants about the dismissal of this Writ Appeal.

(R.S.M.,J.) (T.V.T.S., J.) 14.10.2022 kkn Internet:No Index:Yes Non-speaking order 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1271 of 2013 To:-

1.The Land Commissioner (Land Reforms), Chepauk, Chennai.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Erode – 638 001.
3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1271 of 2013 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

KKN W.A.No.1271 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.9191 of 2020 14.10.2022 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis