Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Shri.Ravi Kumar Bhaskar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 28 March, 2012

                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                             Club Building (Near Post Office)
                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                             Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2012/000115/18125
                                                                     Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2012/000115

Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal

Appellant                            :       Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhaskar
                                             Village Tenduni Ward No-5
                                             PO/PS Bikramganj
                                             Rohtas, BIHAR

Respondent                           :       Mr. Rama Krishnan
                                             Public Information Officer & Dy. Secretary
                                             Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
                                             'A' Wing Shastri Bhawan,
                                             New Delhi-110115

RTI application filed on             :         25/08/2011
PIO replied                          :         27/09/2011
First Appeal                         :         10/10/2011
First Appellate Authority order      :         04/11/2011
Second Appeal received on            :         06/01/2012

Information sought

:

I am graduated in History and want to become script and dialogue writer for the bollywood movies. I have written two films and want Aamir khan, Arbaaz khan to have look on my writings. I wrote a letter to PM's office dated 25/07/2011. What action has been taken on my letter?
Reply of the CPIO:
There is no such scheme in the Ministry to provide assistance to intending scriptwriters.
Grounds for the First Appeal:
The information provided is unsatisfactory Order of the FAA:
FAA upheld the decision of the CPIO.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
Information provided is incomplete and unsatisfactory.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Appellant: Absent;
Respondent: Mr. Rama Krishnan, Public Information Officer & Dy. Secretary;
The Appellant is not seeking information which can be a matter of any record. He states that he wants the PIO to forward his application to Institutes where such courses would be conducted. This is not included in the Right to Information as per the RTI Act.
Page 1 of 2
Decision:
The Appeal is dismissed.
This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties. Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 28 March 2012 (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (PG) Page 2 of 2