Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras

Dr T L Thanulingam vs M/O Commerce on 6 December, 2022

                                   1                 OA 310/01046/2022




             CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                      CHENNAI BENCH

                          OA/310/01046/2022

     Dated Tuesday the 6th day of December Two Thousand Twenty Two

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. T. JACOB, Member (A)
                          &
        HON'BLE MS. LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, Member (J)

Dr. T.L. Thanulingam
S/o. Y.T. Thangiah
aged about 58 years
Working as Diy. Chief Controller of Explosives
South Circle, Chennai
Tower-24, Flat No. 403
Sky City Apartments
Opposite to
M Wedding and Convention
Vanagaram - Ambattur Road.                       ... Applicant

By Advocate M/s. G. Sankaran

Vs

1. Union of India
Rep. By Secretary to Government
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion
Ministry of Commerce and Industry
Government of India, New Delhi 110 011.

2. Chief Controller of Explosives
Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation
Ministry of Commerce and Industry
Government of India
A-Block, 5th Floor, CGO Complex
Seminary Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440 006.     ... Respondents

By Advocate Mr. K. Rajendran
                                       2                   OA 310/01046/2022




                              ORAL ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. T. Jacob, Member(A)) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. K. Rajendran who enters appearance on behalf of the respondents.

2. The relief prayed for in this OA is as follows:

"To direct the respondents to consider applicant's representation dated 19.11.2022 and consider his case for promotion as Joint Chief Controller of Explosives, in the Southern Circle in the existing vacancy and grant such other orders in directions as this Tribunal think fit in the circumstances of the case."

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the representation submitted by the applicant is still pending for consideration. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the pending representation of the applicant within a time limit to be stipulated by this Tribunal. He further submits that OA 761/2022 which is pending before this Tribunal will become infructuous if the relief sought by the applicant in his representation is granted.

4. In view of the limited relief sought and without going into the merits of the case, the competent authority among respondents is directed to consider the representation of the applicant dt. 19.11.2022 3 OA 310/01046/2022 (Annexure A7) and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. OA is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs.

(Lata Baswaraj Patne)                                           (T. Jacob)
     Member (J)                    06.12.2022                  Member (A)
AS