Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Arun Singh S/O Ravindra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 10 October, 2022

Author: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Bench: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

      S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5258/2018

Arun Singh S/o Ravindra Singh, R/o Plot No. 150, Mohan Nagar,
Mandi Road, Hindaun City, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
2.        Dinesh Kumar Kumawat S/o Babu Lal Kumawat, R/o Ward
          No. 19, Bhairu Ji Mod, Ringus, Distt. Sikar (Raj.)
3.        Vikram Kachhawa S/o Rajendra Kachhawa, R/o 813,
          Rajput Colony, Ramchandrapura Chhawani Kota.
4.        Rohit   Yadav   Lamba        S/o      Rajesh       Kumar    Yadav,   R/o
          Karampur, Tehsil Tijara, Distt. Alwar.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Rajendra Yadav GA Cum AAG
                                 Mr. Nishant Sharma
                                 Mr. Mukesh Goyal



     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

                                      Order

10/10/2022

     This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.499/2015

registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (East) for the

offence    under    Section     380     IPC      and     consequential     criminal

proceedings.

     Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel

for the complainant submitted that compromise has been arrived

between the parties and they have settled their dispute.




                      (Downloaded on 11/10/2022 at 08:42:56 PM)
                                                                          (2 of 2)                   [CRLMP-5258/2018]



                                          Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence u/s

                                   380 IPC is non-compoundable. So, criminal proceedings pending

                                   between them, be set aside.

                                          Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments

                                   advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledging the factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that he has no objection if the FIR in question and consequential criminal proceeding are quashed.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record.

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of compromise and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in question and consequential criminal proceeding.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.499/2015 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (East) for the offence under Section 380 IPC and consequential criminal proceedings are quashed.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Brijesh 45.

(Downloaded on 11/10/2022 at 08:42:56 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)