Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Bhaskar Chakraborty And Others vs State Of West Bengal And Others on 16 April, 2013

Author: Soumitra Pal

Bench: Soumitra Pal

                                               1



16. 4 . 2013


                          W.P. 7931(W) of 2013

                      Bhaskar Chakraborty and others
                               Versus
                      State of West Bengal and others


                      Mr. Ekramul Bari,
                             ..for the petitioners.

                      Mr. Naba Kumar Das,
                                ..for the State.

                      Mr. Kalyan Kumar Chakraborty,
                                    ..for the Council.


                      Affidavit of service filed today be kept on record.

                      In the writ petition the petitioners, who were the

               candidates for the selection process of 2009 for the post of

               primary teachers in schools under the jurisdiction of the Uttar

               Dinajpur District Primary School Council, has challenged the

               said process on various grounds. At the very outset it is

               submitted by Mr. Bari, learned advocate for the petitioners

               that he is not pressing prayers (a) and (b) of the writ petition

               and prays for leave to ventilate their grievances before the

               authorities of the Council.

                      Having heard learned advocates for the parties and as

               prayed for on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is
                                  2

disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to file

comprehensive representation, annexing relevant documents,

before the Chairman, Uttar Dinajpur District Primary School

Council, the respondent no.3 within a period of four weeks

from the date of presentation of a copy of the certified copy of this order. If such representation is filed, same shall be disposed of by the respondent no.3 by passing a reasoned order to be communicated to the petitioner no.1 within six weeks. It is, however, made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter and all points are left open to be dealt with by the respondent no.3 in the event representation is filed within the time as stipulated.

No order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished on priority basis.

( Soumitra Pal, J. ) 3