Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 12]

Supreme Court of India

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Merajuddin on 12 April, 1999

Equivalent citations: 2000(1)ALD(CRI)614, 1999(66)ECC60, JT1999(10)SC6, 2006(II)OLR(SC)499, (1999)6SCC43, AIRONLINE 1999 SC 412, (1999) 10 JT 6 (SC), (1999) 10 SUPREME 471.2, (1999) 2 ORISSA LR 557, 1999 (6) SCC 43, 1999 SCC (CRI) 1057, (2000) 1 ALLCRILR 137, (2000) 1 CRIMES 95, (2000) 1 EASTCRIC 329, (2000) 27 ALLCRIR 261, (2000) 3 RAJ LW 406, (2000) 40 ALLCRIC 273, (2000) SC CR R 320, (2006) 2 EFR 569, (2006) 2 ORISSA LR 499, (2006) 2 RECCRIR 227.2, (2006) 35 OCR 512.1, (1999) 10 SUPREME 471, 2005 (9) SCC 282, (2006) 2 RECCRIR 227, (2006) 35 OCR 512

Bench: Chief Justice, M.Jagannadha Rao, N. Santosh Hegde

ORDER

Dr. A.S. Anand, C.J.I.

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. The respondent is accused of an offence under the NDPS Act, 1985. The High Court appears to have completely ignored the mandate of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act while granting him bail. The High Court overlooked the prescribed procedure. That was not proper. We, therefore, allow this appeal and set aside the impugned order of the High Court and cancel the bail granted to the respondent.

4. The respondent is directed to surrender before the trial court within two weeks and if after surrender, he files an application for grant of bail, the same shall be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by the order made by us today. In case the respondent does not surrender within the aforesaid period, the trial court will take steps for apprehending the respondent and remanding him to judicial custody. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms.