Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Faridbhai Aiyyubbhai Ganhci Thro' ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 2 August, 2017

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari, A.J. Shastri

              R/CR.MA/19103/2017                                                 ORDER




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 19103 of 2017
                        In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 22 of 2017
         ==========================================================
              FARIDBHAI AIYYUBBHAI GANHCI THRO' SOHEB TAIYABBHAI
                              GHANCHI....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR CHIRAG M PANCHAL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR BH SOLANKI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR RONAK RAVAL, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
         RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
         MR RUSHI BHAVSAR, ADVOCATE for the Complainant
         ==========================================================
                CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA
                       KUMARI
                       and
                       HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI

                                   Date : 02/08/2017


                                    ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI)

1. Rule.   Mr.Ronak   Raval,   learned   Additional   Public  Prosecutor, waives service of notice of Rule for the  respondents.

2. This application under Section 389(1) of the Code  of   Civil   Procedure,   1973,   has   been   preferred   by   the  applicant   with   a   prayer   to   enlarge   him   on   temporary  Page 1 of 4 HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Thu Aug 03 00:19:53 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/19103/2017 ORDER bail for a period of fifteen days, as his wife, who  has   completed   almost   nine   months   of   pregnancy,   is  supposed to undergo a Cesarean operation tentatively  on 03.08.2017 or shortly thereafter.

3. The applicant is undergoing life imprisonment in  connection with offences punishable under Sections 302  and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. Heard   Mr.B.H.   Solanki,   learned   advocate   for   the  applicant,   Mr.Ronak   Raval,   learned   Additional   Public  Prosecutor and Mr.Rushi Bhavsar, learned advocate for  the   original   complainant   and   perused   the   averments  made in the application.

5. Mr.Rushi   Bhavsar,   learned   advocate,   states   that  he   has   been   instructed   to   appear   on   behalf   of   the  original complainant and would file his Vakalatnama,  during the course of the day. He is permitted to do  so. He has opposed the grant of temporary bail.

7. The   Jail   record   pertaining   to   the   applicant  indicates that his conduct in Jail is good and on the  Page 2 of 4 HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Thu Aug 03 00:19:53 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/19103/2017 ORDER previous occasions, he had surrendered on time, except  for one occasion when he has surrendered a day late.

8. We   have   also   perused   the   Medical   Certificate  issued   by   Dr.Bhavik   Shah   and   Dr.Darshini   Shah   of  Karmaa   Maternity   Hospital,   Naranpura,   Ahmedabad,  wherein it is stated that the wife of the applicant is  supposed   to   undergo   Cesarean   section   tentatively   on  03.08.2017.

9. This application was heard in the morning session  and learned Additional Public Prosecutor was requested  to   verify   the   statement   made   in   the   Medical  Certificate.   Mr.   Ronak   Raval,   learned   Additional  Public Prosecutor, has submitted that he has spoken to  Dr.Darshini Shah, who has issued the Certificate dated  25.07.2017 (Annexure­A), who has stated that the wife  of the applicant has not come to her today but, in any  case,   as   she   has   completed   nine   months'   pregnancy,  Cesarean operation would be done in about four to five  days.

10. Taking   into   consideration   the   above   facts   and  circumstances   as   well   as   the   reason   stated   in   the  Page 3 of 4 HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Thu Aug 03 00:19:53 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/19103/2017 ORDER application,   we   deem   it   appropriate   to   partly   grant  the prayer made by the applicant.

11. Hence, the following order:

The applicant shall be enlarged on temporary bail  for a period of ten days from the date of his actual  release   on   furnishing   a   personal   bond   of   Rs.5,000/­  (Rupees Five Thousand Only) and upon the usual terms  and conditions, to the satisfaction of the concerned  Jail authority.
Upon   the   expiry   of   the   aforesaid   period,   the  applicant   shall   surrender   before   the   concerned   Jail  authority forthwith.

12. The   application   is   partly­allowed,   in   the   above  terms. Rule is made absolute, to the aforesaid extent.

Direct Service of this order is permitted. 

(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) (A.J. SHASTRI, J.) piyush Page 4 of 4 HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Thu Aug 03 00:19:53 IST 2017