Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

The Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs Top Impex Pvt. Ltd. - Opponent(S) on 7 February, 2011

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani

         TAXAP/84/2009                             1/2                                             ORDER


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                 TAX APPEAL No. 84 of 2009


         =========================================================
          THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-II - Appellant(s)
                                    Versus
                      TOP IMPEX PVT. LTD. - Opponent(s)
         =========================================================
         Appearance :
         MRS MAUNA M BHATT for Appellant(s) : 1,
         MR BD KARIA for Opponent(s) : 1,
         =========================================================
                         CORAM : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI

                                   and

                                   HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI

                                     Date : 07/02/2011
                                          ORAL ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. Heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. B.D. Karia, learned advocate appearing in response to the notice issued by this Court.

2. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that the matter requires consideration, hence, ADMIT. The following substantial question of law arises for determination:

"Whether, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in allowing deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when export proceeds in respect of 7 invoices HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Jul 12 00:04:27 IST 2016 TAXAP/84/2009 2/2 ORDER amounting to Rs.17,92,021/- had been received beyond the time period prescribed under section 80HHC[2][a] of the Act?"

[HARSHA DEVANI, J.] [H.B. ANTANI, J.] pirzada/-

HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Jul 12 00:04:27 IST 2016