Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) ... vs M/S Omax Autos Ltd And Anr on 23 December, 2015

Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal, Ramendra Jain

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                             AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                        CWP No. 21337 of 2015
                                                                        Decided on : 23.12.2015

              The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
                                                                                   . . . Petitioner
                                                         Versus
              M/s Omax Autos Ltd. and another
                                                                                . . . Respondents

              CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
                     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

              PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Senior Panel Counsel with
                       Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate and
                       Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate
                       for the petitioner.
                                              ****

              AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the challenge in this writ petition is to the impugned order dated 31.07.2012 (Annexure P-1) passed under Section 245D(2C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act') by the Income Tax Settlement Commission-respondent No.2. It was stated that after the filing of the present writ petition, the Income Tax Settlement Commission has passed the final order under Section 245D(4) of the Act.

2. In view thereof, it was thus prayed that in such circumstances, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such, however, liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the final order passed under Section 245D(4) of the Act.

3. Ordered accordingly.



                                                                  (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
                                                                         JUDGE


                                                                    (RAMENDRA JAIN)
              December 23, 2015                                         JUDGE
              J.Ram




JAWALA RAM
2015.12.24 11:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh