Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Suresh Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 May, 2021

Author: Vishal Mishra

Bench: Vishal Mishra

                           1

              The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                       MCRC-23282-2021
               (SURESH AHIRWAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)




Gwalior, Dated : 13.05.2021

        Shri Vipin Babu Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.

        Shri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned Public Prosecutor, for the State.

        Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard through Video

Conferencing.

        This is second bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. filed by the

applicant for grant of bail. First bail application M.Cr.C.No.18314/21

dated 07.04.2021 was dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to repeat

the same after obtaining the FSL report with respect to liquor.

        Applicant has been arrested on 23.02.2021 by Police Station

Kurwai, District Vidisha(M.P.) in connection with Crime No.69/2021

registered in relation to the offence punishable u/Ss 49(A) of M.P.

Excise Act.

        It is stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the

case.    He has not committed any offence in any manner. The

prosecution has shown a recovery of illegal liquor in a plastic can

from the possession of the applicant. Charge-sheet has been filed on

05.03.2021. He is in custody since 23.02.2021. Applicant is the first

offender. He is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions that may

be imposed by this Court while considering his bail application.

        Per contra, counsel for the State has opposed the application
                             2

             The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                      MCRC-23282-2021
                (SURESH AHIRWAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)




stating that FSL report is not received till date. But            he has not

disputed the fact that applicant is the first offender as per the case

diary.

         Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and

looking to the pandemic scenario of Covid pandemic-19 and also the

fact that applicant is the first offender, this Court deems it appropriate

to allow this application, accordingly, the application is allowed

subject to verification of the fact that applicant is the first offender. The

applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with one

solvent surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigation

Officer /trial Court, as the case may be with submission of written

undertaking and he shall abide by all terms and conditions of the

different circulars, orders as well as guidelines issued by the Central

Government, State Government as well as Local Administration for

maintaining social distancing, hygiene etc to avoid Novel Corona Virus

(COVID -19) pandemic and he will have to install Arogya Setu App,

if not already installed.

         This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the

following conditions by the applicant :-

1.

The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of 3 The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-23282-2021 (SURESH AHIRWAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) the bond executed by him;

2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. In case of involvement in any other offence, the bail granted by this Court, his bail application shall automatically cancelled.

5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

7. In case the FSL report shows that the liquor seized is harmful for human consumption then the bail granted by this Court stands cancelled automatically and applicant has to surrender immediately and apply for regular bail.

8. The applicant will inform the concerned S.H.O. of concerned Police Station about his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the Public Prosecutor to send E-copy of this order to SHO of concerned police station as well as Superintendent of 4 The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-23282-2021 (SURESH AHIRWAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) Police, concerned who shall inform the concerned SHO regarding the same.

In view of the COVID-19, jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, medical examination of applicant shall be undertaken by the jail doctor and on prima facie, if it is found that he is having the symptoms of COVID-19, then consequential follow up action including the isolation/quarantine or any test if required, be ensured, otherwise applicants shall be released immediately on bail and shall be given a pass or permit for movement to reach his place of residence.

Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.


                                                        (Vishal Mishra)
mani                                                        V. Judge


  SUBASRI MANI
  2021.05.13
  19:20:40 -07'00'