Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 23]

Patna High Court - Orders

Raj Ballam Singh @ Raj Ballam Prasad & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 20 April, 2018

Author: Shivaji Pandey

Bench: Shivaji Pandey

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Criminal Miscellaneous No.18861 of 2018
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2017 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna
               ======================================================
            1. Raj Ballam Singh @ Raj Ballam Prasad, S/o Prabha Singh,
            2. Sunil Singh @ Sunil Yadav S/o Raj Ballam Singh,
            3. Mehilal Singh @ Mehilal Yadav @ Mehilal Kumar Yadav S/o Raj
               Ballam Singh,
            4. Sahil Kumar S/o Mehilal Singh @ Mehilal Yadav, All R/o
               Village- Dumari, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Syed Asgher Najmi, Adv.
                                                Miss Minu Kumari, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Smt. Anita Kumari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-04-2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 323, 341, 307, 325, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per First Information Report, the cause of dispute is the falling of leaves of tree in the courtyard of the Informant. When the objection was raised, the accused persons has aggressively entered and started abusing and assaulting the inmates causing injuries to the family members of the Informant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18861 of 2018(3) dt.20-04-2018 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, above named, is rejected.

If the petitioners surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and pray for bail, the court below will consider the same and pass order on the same day of their surrender.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/-

U         T