Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

M/S. Killedar Construction Co.And 6 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 2 Ors on 4 February, 2020

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: K. K. Tated, Sarang V. Kotwal

 Seema                                                 22. WP 626 of 2016.odt



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 626 OF 2016
                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 625 OF 2016
 M/s. Killedar Constructions Co. & 4 Ors.          ...Petitioners
          Versus
 State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors.                     ...Respondents
                             ----------
 Mr. Deepak Shukla a/w Ms. Jainy Rughani i/b. M/s. Vinod
 Mistry & Co. - Advocate for the petitioner.
 Mr. Himanshu Takke - AGP for the respondent no. 1 & 2 in WP
 626 of 2016.
 Mr. Amit Shashtri - AGP for the respondent in WP 625 of 2016.
 Mr. Parth Zaveri a/w Mr. Mohd.Taha i/b. Judicare Law
 Associates for respondent no. 3.
                              ----------
                           CORAM : K. K. TATED &
                                   SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 4th FEBRUARY, 2020. P.C. :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned Advocate Mr. Deepkal Shukla for the petitioner submits that he misplaced set of case papers. So he requires sometime to reconstruct the same. Therefore, on his request, Stand over to 9th March, 2020.

[SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.] 1/1 ::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 07/06/2020 11:21:45 :::