Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Jagdish Pandey vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others on 7 August, 2023

Author: Saral Srivastava

Bench: Saral Srivastava





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:158534
 
Court No. - 2
 

 
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7726 of 2023
 

 
Petitioner :- Jagdish Pandey
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Umang Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Kumar Om,Sudhir Bharti,Suresh Singh
 

 
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
 

1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, Advocate (bearing Advocate Roll No.A/A1274/2012) holding brief of Sri Umang Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel and Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4.

2. The petitioner has come up in the present petition with a sole prayer that a direction be issued to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Basgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. filed in Case No.128 of 2023 (Jagdish and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) expeditiously, within a time bound period.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Basgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. filed in Case No.128 of 2023 (Jagdish and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case.

Order Date :- 7.8.2023 R.S. Tiwari