Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Arogyaswamy @ Arogya, vs Veereshappa H. S/O Chandrashekarappa ... on 1 August, 2018

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                   DHARWAD BENCH

       DATED THIS THE 01 s t DAY OF AUGUST 2018

                        BEFORE

        THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

           M.F.A. No.104263 OF 2017 [MV]

BETWEEN:

       AROGYASWAMY @ AROGYA,
       S/O ARAPPA @ HALAPPA,
       AGE: 36 YEARS,
       OCC: CABLE OPERATOR,
       R/O: 99, SATHYANAVANI NAGAR,
       INDIRA NAGAR, BALLARI-583101.
                                            ... APPELLANT
(By Sri. Y LAKSHMIKANT REDDY ADV.)

AND:

1.   VEERESHAPPA H.
     S/O CHANDRASHEKARAPPA H,
     AGE: 37 YEARS,
     OCC: DRIVER OF THE TATA ACE VEHICLE,
     BEARING REGN. NO. KA-34/A-5631,
     R/O: NO. 34, MATASUGUR VILLAGE,
     SIRUGUPPA TALUKA,
     BALLARI DISTRICT-583101.

2.   SHIVA BASAPPA,
     S/O POMANAGOUDA,
     AGE: 57 YEARS,
     OCC: OWNER OF THE TATA ACE VEHICLE,
     BEARING REGN. NO. KA-34/A-5631,
     R/O: D. NO. 22, W.NO. 3,
     BADANAHATTI VILLAGE IN
     BALLARI TALUKA AND DISTRICT-583101.
                                  :2:             MFA No.104263/2017



3.   THE BRANCH MANAGER,
     M/S IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL
     INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
     BALLARI-583101.
                                                  ... RESPONDENTS

(NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2 DISPENSED WITH;
     By Sri. RAVINDRA R MANE ADV. FOR R3)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES
ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
03.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.233/2015 ON THE FILE OF
THE MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL-XII, BALLARI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION    FOR    COMPENSATION      AND    SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

      This appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court
delivered the following:-

                               JUDGMENT

Both sid e submit that parties have comp romised the matter. Having regard to the same, notice to respondent Nos.1 and 2 is d isp ensed with. Delay of 218 days in filing the app eal is condoned . IA No.1 of 2018 and memo are disposed off accordingly.

2. This claimant's app eal arises out of the judgment and award d ated 03.01.2017 in MVC No.233/2015 passed by MACT-XII, Ballari. The :3: MFA No.104263/2017 challenge to the award is on the ground of q uantum of comp ensation.

3. Both counsel on instruction have filed joint memo reporting that the p arties have settled the matter amicably and app ellant has ag reed to receive Rs.1,80,000/- in addition to the award amount in full settlement of his claim.

4. Having reg ard to said settlement, the app eal is partly allowed . The impugned award is modified as follows:

(i) The compensation award ed by the Tribunal is enhanced glob ally by Rs.1,80,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty Thousand only);
(ii) Respondent No.3 / insurer shall deposit before the Tribunal the said ad ditional sum of Rs.1,80,000/- payable to the claimant within six weeks from the d ate of receip t of cop y of this order. Failing which the said sum shall carry interest :4: MFA No.104263/2017 at 9% per annum for the delayed period;
(iii) Out of the aforesaid amount, 50% shall be invested in fixed deposit in any nationalized bank for a term of three years in the name of the claimant. The balance amount shall be d isbursed to the claimant.

Sd/-

JUDGE RK/-