Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam

N R Prabhu vs C Viswanath, Secy,D/O Pension &Amp Pw ... on 26 August, 2020

                                     1

             CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
                    ERNAKULAM BENCH

                 Contempt Petition (C) No. 180/00018/2017
                       in OA No. 180/00021/2015

              Wednesday, this the 26th day of August, 2020

CORAM:

      Hon'ble Mr. P. Madhavan, Judicial Member
      Hon'ble Mr. K.V. Eapen, Administrative Member

N.R. Prabhu, retired Accountant Member of Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, XL/1670, Pulleppady Cross Road,
Kochi - 682 018.                                     .....       Petitioner

(By Advocate :     Mr. Christopher Abraham - Not present)


                                Versus


1.    Shri C. Viswanath, Secretary, Department of Pension & Pensioner's
      Welfare, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions,
      3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi - 110 003.

2.    Shri Anil Kumar, Senior Accounts Officer (Legal Cell),
      Central Pension Accounting Office, Trikoot-II, Bhikaji Cama Place,
      New Delhi - 110 066.

3.    Shri Krishnan Gopal, Senior Accounts Officer (Legal Affairs),
      Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law, Justice and Corporate
      Affairs, "B" Wing, IV Floor, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath,
      New Delhi - 110 012.                             .... Respondents

(By Advocate :     Mr. N. Anilkumar, SCGSC)


      This Contempt Petition having been heard on 26.08.2020 through

video conferencing, the Tribunal on the same day delivered the following:
                                          2

                             O R D E R (Oral)

Hon'ble Mr. P. Madhavan, Judicial Member -

Heard the Advocate appearing for the respondents through video conferencing. Petitioner's counsel not present.

2. Learned counsel for the contempt respondents submitted that the OP (CAT) No. 198/2017 filed by the respondents was allowed and there is no purpose in continuing the Contempt Petition. Therefore, the Contempt Petition is closed. Notice discharged.

(K.V. EAPEN)                                         (P. MADHAVAN)
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER                             JUDICIAL MEMBER




"SA"
                                  3

Contempt Petition (C) No. 180/00018/2017 in OA No. 180/00021/2015 Petitioners' Annexures Annexure P1 - True copy of the order in OA 180/21/15 dt.

29/07/2016 of the Hon'ble CAT, Ernakulam. Respondents' Annexure Nil

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-