Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Rajendra Kumari Kanwar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 26 May, 2017

                                       1

                                                                         NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                             WPS No. 2438 of 2017

   • Rajendra Kumari Kanwar D/o R. L. Paikara, Aged About 31 Years R/o
     Village Sundreli, Post Jarve, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh).

                                                                  ---- Petitioner

                                    Versus

   1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural
      Development Department, Mantralaya New Raipur, Post Office & Police
      Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

   2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Janjgir- Champa, District
      Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh).

   3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sakti, Janjgir- Champa
      District Janjgir- Chamap (Chhattisgarh).

                                                              ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri UKS Chandel, Advocate For Respondents-State : Shri RK Gupta, GA for the State Hon'ble The Vacation Judge Order On Board 26/05/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that vide order dated 29.04.2017 the petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat, Jarve to Gram Panchayat, Lavsara, on probation period.

2. Considering the submission made by the learned State counsel that the impugned transfer order has been passed on administrative exigency, it may not be open for this Court to assess the existence or gravity of the administrative exigency, which has necessitated the impugned order, therefore, let the petitioner move a representation before the concerned Secretary raising her grievance in the matter within a period of two weeks 2 from today. On such representation being filed, the concerned Secretary shall decide the representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of submission of representation.

3. Till the petitioner's representation is decided or for a period of six weeks, whichever is earlier, the impugned order shall remain stayed in respect of the petitioner and she shall be allowed to continue at the present place of posting.

Sd/-

V. JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA ashu