Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Pankaj Kumar Chandel vs State Of H.P. & Others on 2 September, 2020

Bench: L. Narayana Swamy, Anoop Chitkara

                              1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                         CWP No.3356 of 2020.
                        Date of Decision : September 02, 2020.




                                                                .

Pankaj Kumar Chandel                                     ...Petitioner.

                         Versus





State of H.P. & Others                                 ...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice





The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner       :        Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents
                      r  :        Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr.

                                  Adarsh Sharma & Ms. Rita Goswami,
                                  Addl.A.Gs.

     COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO
                    CONFERENCE.



Anoop Chitkara, Judge. (Oral)

The petitioner, who is working as Patwari at Patwar Circle Changar Talai, Tehsil Jhanduta, District Bilaspur, H.P. and is under transfer to Patwar Circle Chhatt, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P., has come up before this Court seeking quashing of impugned order of transfer dated 26.8.2020, Annexure P-3.

2. Notice. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.

1

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2020 20:18:30 :::HCHP 2

4. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation to the first respondent, within .

one week, in accordance with the transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the said respondent shall consider the same, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, and pass appropriate orders, within two weeks. Subject to filing of representation by the petitioner within the time-frame mentioned above, the operation of impugned order dated 26.8.2020 (Annexure P-3), qua the petitioner, shall remain stayed till the disposal of the representation. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.

Copy Dasti.

(L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice.

(Anoop Chitkara), Judge September 02, 2020 (ps) ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2020 20:18:30 :::HCHP