Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Sri.V.B.Deshpande vs Sri.G.B.Deshpande on 14 December, 2017

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017

                          BEFORE

 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR

                    R.F.A. No.1684/2013

BETWEEN :

SRI V.B.DESHPANDE
S/O LATE B.A.DESHPANDE
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/AT NO.570, SAMPIGE ROAD
MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE-560003                              ...APPELLANT

            (BY SRI S.MANJUNATH, ADV. - ABSENT.)

AND :

1.      SRI G.B.DESHPANDE
        S/O LATE B.A.DESHPANDE
        AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
        R/AT NO.127, 8TH A MAIN ROAD
        4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE,
        BASAVESHWARANAGAR
        BANGALORE-560079

2.      SRI K.B.DESHPANDE
        S/O LATE B.A.DESHPANDE
        AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
        R/AT NO.87A, 22ND CROSS
        2ND FLOOR, RAJAJINAGAR
        BANGALORE-10

3.      SRI K.B.VAIDYA
        S/O LATE B.G.VAIDYA
        AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
                           -2-


4.   SRI NANDAGOPAL VAIDYA
     S/O K.B.VAIDYA
     AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

5.   SMT.VIBHA ARAVIND
     W/O ARAVIND NATH
     D/O K.B.VAIDYA
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

6.   SMT.SOWMYA VAIDYA
     W/O SRIDHARA MURTHY
     D/O K.B.VAIDYA
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

     RESPONDENTS No.3 TO 6
     ARE R/O No.3/A, 1ST CROSS,
     JUDGES LAYOUT,
     SANJAYANAGAR
     BANGALORE-560094                   ...RESPONDENTS


     THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41, RULE-1 AND 2
R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE      JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 06.07.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6082/2009 ON
THE FILE OF XXXVIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION
AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

     THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                -3-


                              ORDER

Appellant's counsel is absent.

For the reason that the appellant's counsel has failed to comply the office objections, appeal is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

JUDGE AN/-