Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Krishna R Jagatia & 6 vs Sandipkumar Natvarlal Naik & 2 on 15 October, 2014

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

          C/CA/1460/2004                                    ORDER




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1460 of 2004

           In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2251 of 2004

================================================================
               KRISHNA R JAGATIA & 6....Applicant(s)
                            Versus
         SANDIPKUMAR NATVARLAL NAIK & 21....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR AJAY B CHAVDA, ADVOCATE for MR MAULIN R RAVAL, ADVOCATE for
the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 7
MR AMIT BAROT, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 11
MR KEYUR ACHARYA, ADVOCATE for MR GM JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the
Respondent(s) No. 1 - 9
================================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

                             Date : 15/10/2014


                              ORAL ORDER

1. Heard   learned   advocate   Mr.Ajay   B   Chavda   appearing  for Mr.Maulin B Raval, learned advocate for the applicants, learned  advocate   Mr.Keyur   Acharya   appearing   for   Mr.G.M.Joshi,   learned  advocate   for   the   respondents   Nos.1   to   9   and   Mr.Amit   Barot,  learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent  No.11 - State. 

2. Rule.   Learned   advocate   Mr.Keyur   Acharya   for  Mr.G.M.Joshi,   learned   advocate   has   waived   service   of   Rule   on  behalf of the respondents Nos.1 to 9 and Mr.Amit Barot, learned  Assistant Government Pleader has waived service of Rule on behalf  of respondent No.11 - State. 

Page 1 of 6 C/CA/1460/2004 ORDER

3. Seven applicants, medical students have taken out the  present   application   during   the   pendency   of   the   petition   being  Special Civil Application No.2251 of 2004 and prayed inter alia : 

"The   Applicants   be   allowed   to   be   joined   as  party   respondents   and   the   petitioners   be  directed   to   carry   out   necessary   amendment  and   serve   a   copy   of   the   petition   to   the  petitioner.
The   applicants   be   allowed   sufficient   time   to  file necessary reply in the petition placing on  record   the   details   and   the   facts   after   being  joined as party respondent."

4. So   far   as   the   main   petition   is   concerned,   about   nine  petitioners,   medical   students,  have  filed  the   said  petition   prayed  inter alia :

"This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of   Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or   any   other   appropriate   Writ,   Order   of   direction   quashing and setting aside the decision of the Vice   Chancellor   dated  12.02.2004  as  reflected  from the   press note issued under the signature of the Registrar,   giving direction to the office of the University to issue   forms   to   the   students   seeking   admission   to   Post   Graduate   Courses,   who   would   be   completing   their   internship   in   September/October­2004   and   all   consequential action pursuant thereof as violative of   Under Graduate Regulations as well as Post Graduate   Medical   Education   Regulations­2000   and   the  admission rules framed for that purpose, by declaring  that   the   Respondent   University   has   no   power   to   permit any student to appear in the examination for   admission  to  Post  Graduate Courses to be held on   Page 2 of 6 C/CA/1460/2004 ORDER 16.04.2004 who would be competing their internship   after 15.04.2004, as 16.04.2004 being the date of   examination.
Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this   petition,   be   pleased   to   restrain   the   Respondent   University   from   issuing   or   accepting   from   the   students   who   would   be   completing   their   one   year   compulsory   rotating   housemanship/internship   after  15.04.2004 and whose names do not appear in Para­ I   of   the   Register   maintained   under   the   Gujarat   Medical Council Act­1961."

5. As   mentioned   earlier,   above   seven   medical   students  have taken out the present application and prayed,  inter alia  that  they may be joined as a party respondents in the said petition.  The  said request is made on the ground that applicants are interested in  the proceedings taken out by the nine petitioners and if, any order  is  passed in the main petition, the said order is likely affect the  interest of the applicants of the present application. The applicants  have averred inter alia :

"The applicants begs to submit that the present  petition   to   the   best   of   the   knowledge   of   the  applicants   is   filed   by   the   students   who   are  repeater students, and are low on merit than the  applicants   and   have   failed   once   or   more   than  once.  It is humbly submitted that only because of  the delay that has been caused for no fault of the  applicants,   the   applicants   are   not   able   to  complete   the   so   called   eligibility   criteria   and  therefore   an   absolute   anomaly   is   likely   to   be  created.
Page 3 of 6 C/CA/1460/2004 ORDER
It is humbly submitted that any order that may be  passed in this petition is likely to adversely affect  the applicants and their career and future of the  applicants.
It   is   further   submitted   that   the   applicants   if  permitted to be joined as party would be able to  place   the   true   and   correct   facts   on   record   and  could   point   out   to   this   Hon'ble   Court   that   by  granting any relief in the present petition serious  anomaly and chaos wold be created in this and  forthcoming   subsequent   academic   year.     It   is  humbly   submitted   that   the   delay   caused   in  granting   admission   to   the   applicants   and   the  students who are similarly placed as applicant has  caused extra ordinary and exceptional situation.  It is, therefore, submitted that the applicants be  joined as party respondents so as to ensure that  true and correct facts are placed on the record so  that Hon'ble Court an reach a conclusion which  would be in the interest of justice and students at  large and that merit is not sacrificed.  It is further  submitted that if the applicants are not allowed to  be   joined   as   party   in   view   of   this   application,  many such other students seeking the admission  for the Post Graduate course in this year are likely  to be dehorse of merit which would be contrary  to the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in  several judicial pronouncements.   Whereas if the  applicants   are   allowed   to   be   joined   as   party  respondent, no harm or prejudice whatsoever is  likely to be caused to the petitioner or anybody  and   the   applicants   would   be   able   to   place   true  and correct facts which are very much essential  for  consideration of issues raised in the present  petition."  

6. On the said premises, the above quoted relief is prayed  for.

Page 4 of 6 C/CA/1460/2004 ORDER

7. Before   proceeding   further,   it   is   relevant   to   note   and  mention   that   one   medical   student   had   also   taken   out   similar  application being Civil Application No. 1385 of 2004 and prayed  for similar relief i.e. that she may be joined as party respondent in  the main petition.    The said request came  to be granted by this  Court vide order dated 27.02.2004.

8. Actually, on examination of the relief prayed for in the main petition, it appears that the petition is rendered infructuous and after lapse of 10 years, the cause to prosecute the petition, does not survive.

9. However, the said main petition is not listed for hearing  today,   on   the   other   hand,   the   present   application   is   listed   after  about 10 years.  

10. It   is   also   noticed   from   the   record,   more   particularly  from   the   order   that   until   now   the   said   application   is   not  prosecuted. As such, it seems that present application and the main  petition are rendered infructuous.  

11.   However, learned advocate for the petitioner as well as  the respondents - petitioners in the main petition, state that they  are   not   able   to   clarify   as   to   whether   the   petition   is   rendered  infructuous or not.

12. On   the   contrary,   learned   advocate   for   the   applicants  and the respondents have prayed for time and prayed that matter  Page 5 of 6 C/CA/1460/2004 ORDER may be listed after sometime.

13. In view of the order dated 27.02.2004 passed in Civil  Application No.1385 of 2004 and in light of the facts of this case,  present application is allowed.  The applicants are permitted to join  the proceedings as a party respondent in Special Civil Application  No.2251 of 2004 at their cost.

14. The applicants, if they so desire, may collect the record  of the petition and appear at the time of hearing of main petition.  

15. This  application stands allowed in terms of Para 7 (B)  and (C).   Cause title to be amended accordingly.

16. Rule   is   made   absolute   to   above   extent.     Orders  accordingly.

17. Office is directed to list the main petition i.e. Special        Civil Application No.2251 of 2004 for appropriate orders on  17 th  October, 2014.

(K.M.THAKER, J.) Amar Page 6 of 6