Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Kanhaiya Lal Kashyap vs Amitabh Jain 109 Wps/6398/2017 Smt. Bot ... on 24 November, 2017

Author: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

                                                                                           NAFR

              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                 CONT No. 688 of 2017

        Kanhaiya Lal Kashyap S/o Shri Ram Bharos Kashyap, Aged About
        52 Years Ex. Labour R/o Village Pendri, P. S. And Tahsil Janjgir
        District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

                                                                               ---- Petitioner

                                            Versus

     1. Amitabh Jain Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi
        Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

     2. S. L. Yadav, Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water
        Management Division Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

     3. Shashank Singh, Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water
        Management Sub Division Iii, Birra, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa
        Chhattisgarh

                                                                          ---- Respondents

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For petitioner : Mr. K. P. S. Gandhi, Advocate

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 24/11/2017 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interim order of stay against reinstatement was vacated by order dated 26-10-2017. After the order was vacated, the respondent were under an obligation to allow the petitioner to continue to work. Presently work is not being taken from him.

2. The petitioner should first seek appropriate direction in the pending writ petition. By way of contempt petition, award can not be enforced.

4. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit