Karnataka High Court
Karnataka Handloom Development ... vs Sri Aravind S Rajamanya on 6 July, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
Bench: Mohan Shantanagoudar
Age '57fyears IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 6''" am OF JULV, zozo. BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MOHZAN :';3fH..I;\'NTANAE-GUEAF<1,_:« wan PETITIONNQ,45'Sf2QO8(L§§§A(31);" BETWEEN: M Karnataka Handloom D'eve§.opm§er:;t _ Corporation Limited, No.1; Tahk R0:-ad __ Priyadarshini C_o'I'n_merc.'i"al"Cojmpl.Eéx_ ' Uksoor, Banga|o're%S6G=._04g2=7 ' By its Mar1_a--gingi'Q_i_:f.ector, , ..Petitioner (By Stfi..H, _C'h_a'-n:Cl'r'a", L. Goyindra§;;AVdvE':,',) _ AND 4- V Arayind S. 'Ra_j'am.anj/a S/.o.%.«:Raj'amanya»._. _ » :No._12,1V '(.O£d"=No.280/B) ' '3V3'*"' C_:fo.gAs-, SP5 :;5£ock ~Ja'y.a'na'gar,._ Bangatore~82. ..Respondent
Sr'i'-V:§sée'!.V'eIkrishnan, Adv.,) This writ petition is fiied under Articles 226 and 227 of t,h_o"C0nstitution of India, praying to quash the order dated .2- 27.11.2006 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner and the Controlling Authority. Bangalore vide Annexute-.5. This writ petition coming on for preliminaryjiegirihg in B--Group, this day the Court made the fo11owing_:.-§__ QRDER The petitioner has sought=.for;'qtras'h.E'n-o:"theVferder dated 27.11.2006 passed:__v"'by the V:;3.ss:st'énjti....La~bo0r~..' Commissioner and,' the,.._.u:'Co'n.tLroIiin'g--_ Aitxthority, Bangalore, as well 23.8.2007 passed by in Appeal No.cR.50:20k.36}0~:€. % It notice of the Court that the impt}'~g4_r1er;I or_d'eV.rs*Jcomplied with by paying the gratgitys oran"'--..7V>.:':2v___.__"_.~_)'.A.'.2€)07 and 24.10.2007. The 'statem_e'nt«..:o'fv objections clearly reveals the same. In View same, the writ petition becomes infruettjous.
'V Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
sd/-= JUDGE *0}:/--