Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Gajanand Marwari @ Agarwal & Ors vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors on 1 May, 2023

Author: Amrita Sinha

Bench: Amrita Sinha

  24   01.05
Ct
No24
       2023                   In the High Court At Calcutta
 AGM
                             Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                      Appellate Side

                                  WPA 10119 of 2021

                       Gajanand Marwari @ Agarwal & Ors.
                                      Vs
                    The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

               Mr. Sanat Kumar Dutta
               Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh
                                              ... For the petitioners.


                     The property in question, i.e. premises nos. 57,

               Monoranjan Roychowdhury Road, Kolkata 700017 has

               been declared as a thika property by the Controller,

               Kolkata Thika Tenancy by order dated 19 th December,

               2016. The names of the thika tenants are reflected in the

               said order.

                     The Deputy Controller, Kolkata Thika Tenancy by a

               communication dated 02.06.2017 intimated the Chief

               Manager Revenue (South) mentioning that the Thika

               Controller accepted the persons mentioning therein as

               joint thika tenants.

                     The grievance of the petitioners is that till date the

               property is yet to be mutated in their names by the KMC.

                     The Corporation by a communicated dated 18 th

               March, 2019 directed the petitioners to produce copy of

               the order passed by the learned Wakf Tribunal regarding

               the claim of Kolkata Thika Tenancy. The petitioners

               categorically contend that the property is a thika property

               and the Wakf does not play any role in the matter.
                            2




       None represents the KMC.

       Affidavit of service filed today in Court be kept with

the records.

       From the documents annexed to the writ petition, it

is evidently clear that there is a declaration of the

property being thika by the Controller, Kolkata Thika

Tenancy. There is a further communication by the Deputy

Controller, Kolkata Thika Tenancy to the Chief Manager

Revenue (South) for mutation of the property in favour of

the joint thika tenants. There is no iota of evidence that

the property is a wakf property and accordingly, the

question of any order being passed by the Wakf Tribunal

in connection with the said property cannot arise at all.

       In view of the above, the communication dated

18.03.2019 is set aside and quashed.

       The Chief Manager Revenue (South) being the

respondent no. 6 is directed to take necessary steps for

mutation of the subject property in favour of the thika tenants in terms of the direction passed by the Controller, Kolkata Thika Tenancy vide order dated 19 th December, 2016 subject to the compliance of the necessary formalities.

The aforesaid respondent shall intimate the petitioners the formalities that are required to be complied for effecting the mutation.

Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest but positively within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of communication of this order. 3

Learned advocate for the petitioners is directed to forward a copy of the order dated 19 th December, 2016, the communication dated 2nd June, 2017 to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order to the Court.

The writ petition stands disposed of. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)