Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Spanco Bpo Services Ltd vs Employee State Insurance Corporation ... on 15 September, 2015

Author: Paramjeet Singh

Bench: Paramjeet Singh

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                              AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                 CWP No. 2688 of 2013.
                                                                 Date of Decision : 15.09.2015

                       M/s SPANCO BPO Services Ltd.

                                                                               ...Petitioner

                                                          Versus

                       Employee State Insurance Corporation and others

                                                                               ...Respondents

                       CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH

                                1)   Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see
                                     the judgment?
                                2)   To be referred to the Reporters or not?
                                3)   Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

                       Present:      Mr. Adarsh Jain, Senior Advocate with
                                     Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate
                                     for the petitioner.

                                     Mr. Vikas Suri, Senior Standing counsel
                                     for respondents No. 1 to 3.

                                     ***

                       Paramjeet Singh, J.(Oral)

Registry has reported that notice issued to the petitioner has not been received back served or otherwise. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that he has made efforts to contact the petitioner but he is unable to contact him and states that he has no instructions.

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       September 15, 2015.                              (PARAMJEET SINGH)
KANCHAN
2015.09.19 09:37
                       kanchan                                               JUDGE
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh