Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Kerala High Court

Mariakutty Thommen vs State Of Kerala on 14 November, 1978

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                        PRESENT:

                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

                  FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1940

                                  WP(C).No. 13722 of 2018


PETITIONER(S):
------------

1    MARIAKUTTY THOMMEN
     W/O.THOMMEN, AGED 87 YEARS, VATTOLYIL HOUSE,
     PASUPPARA KARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

2    OUSEPH THOMMEN
     S/O.THOMMEN, AGED 63 YEARS, VATTOLYIL HOUSE,
     PASUPPARA KARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

3    JAMES JOSEPH
     S/O.THOMMEN, AGED 59 YEARS, VATTOLYIL HOUSE,
     PASUPPARA KARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

4    MATHAI JOSEPH
     S/O.JOSEPH, AGED 93 YEARS, AZHANCHIRA HOUSE,
     PASUPPARA KARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.


        BY ADV.SRI.A.C.DEVASIA

RESPONDENT(S):
---------------

1.   STATE OF KERALA
     REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO REVENUE,
     GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
     PIN 695001.

2.   DISTRICT COLLECTOR
     COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI, KUYILIMALA, PAINAVU,
     IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685508.

3.   TAHSILDAR
     TALUK OFFICE, PEERMADU, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
     PIN - 685508.

        BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-04-2018,
     THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 13722 of 2018 (M)

                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-----------------------

EXHIBIT-P1:      TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED DATED 14.11.1978.

EXHIBIT-P2:      TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE
                 VILLAGE OFFICER VAGAMON DATED 7.4.2018.

EXHIBIT-P3:      TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED DATED 29.11.1978
                 ISSUED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR L.A.

EXHIBIT-P4:      TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 7.4.2018
                 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER VAGAMON.

EXHIBIT-P5:      TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA WAS ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF
                 THE 4TH PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P6:      TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE
                 VAGAMON VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 17.10.2017.

EXHIBIT-P7:      TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED
                 30.10.2017.

EXHIBIT-P8:      TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE
                 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT-P9:      TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BY THE 4TH
                 PETITIONER FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
                 DATED 3.11.2012.


RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
--------------------


                                                 //TRUE COPY//


                                                 P.A. TO JUDGE

dlk/16/4/

                         SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
             -----------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No. 13722 of 2018
            ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 13th day of April, 2018

                             JUDGMENT

According to the petitioners, they have secured Ext.P1, P3 and P5 Pattas in accordance with the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner in this writ petition is that, a mistake has arisen in the aforesaid Pattas in respect of the number of the survey. Seeking correction, petitioners have submitted Exts.P8 and P9 representations before the third respondent, which are pending consideration. The relief sought for by the petitioners is based on Ext.P7 passed by the State Government dated 30.10.2017, by which the District Collectors are given the power to consider such applications and pass appropriate orders, however, by virtue of a circular issued by the respective District Collectors, the third respondent is vested W.P.(C) No. 13722 of 2018 2 with power to initially scrutinize the application and for finalisation forward the same to the District Collector.

3. That being the situation, there will be a direction to the third respondent to consider Exts.P8 and P9 representations, after hearing the petitioners and take a decision within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Thereafter, the proceedings shall be handed over to the second respondent for finalisation, immediately thereafter. On receipt of the proceedings from the third respondent, the second respondent shall attain finality to the proceedings within two months thereafter.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE dlk/12/4/