Karnataka High Court
M/S Ashed Valmark vs State Of Karnataka on 14 June, 2022
Author: Ritu Raj Awasthi
Bench: Ritu Raj Awasthi
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
CCC NO. 79/2022 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN
1. M/S ASHED VALMARK
AN ASSOCIATION OF PERSON
REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSOCIATES
(a) M/S ASHED PROPERTIES AND
INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
SRI SAMEER KHAN
(b) M/S VALMARK BUILDERS
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER
SRI NAKODA CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
MAHAVEER GULECHA
BOTH ARE SITUATED AT NO.133/1
10TH FLOOR, RESIDENCY ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 025
2. REGENCY PINNACLE HEIGHTS
OWNERS ASSOCIATION
OFFICE SITUATED AT
REGENCY PINNACLE HEIGHTS
RACHENAHALLI
2
BENGALURU - 560 077
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. H. RAJENDRA KAMATH
S/O SRI K SUBHASCHANDRA KAMATH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
...COMPLAINANTS
(BY SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. MR. GAURAV GUPTA
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
N R SQUARE
BENGALURU - 560 001
3. MS. PALLAVI
JOINT COMMISSIONER
(YELAHANKA ZONE)
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BENGALURU - 560 001
4. MR. INDRA KUMAR G
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
STORM WATER DRAIN
YELAHANKA ZONE
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BENGALURU - 560 001
5. MR. JAGADISH
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
3
STORM WATER DRAIN
(YELAHANKA ZONE)
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BENGALURU - 560 001
6. MR. CHANDRASHEKHAR
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
STORM WATER DRAIN
(YELAHANKA ZONE)
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BENGALURU - 560 001
...ACCUSED
(BY SRI H.R. SHOWRI, AGA FOR A-1;
SRI V.G. BHANUPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR A-2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO
INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN FOR
CONTEMPT OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 24.02.2020 IN
W.P.NO.1981/2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE
BY ISSUING A NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACCUSED
SHOULD NOT BE HELD GUILTY OF CONTEMPT IN TERMS OF
SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,
1971 (ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
This contempt petition arises out of the order dated 24.02.2020 passed in W.P.No.1981/2020.
2. On the last date, Mr. V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned counsel appearing for accused No.2 had submitted that the estimate for reconstruction of wall has been prepared and the repair work shall be completed within a period of four weeks.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the complainants submits that the accused have reconstructed the wall as per the undertaking given by them on the last date, as such, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel appearing for accused No.2 also agrees for the same.
5. The contempt petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
5
6. The pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
JUDGE bkv