Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Surya Kant Jaipuria vs Auduth Timblo on 25 September, 2024

Author: Abhay S. Oka

Bench: Abhay S. Oka

     ITEM NO.11                              COURT NO.6                 SECTION IX

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                   No(s).   11666/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-03-2022
     in AUA No. 15/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
     at Goa)

     SURYA KANT JAIPURIA & ORS.                                           Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     AUDUTH TIMBLO & ORS.                                                 Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 83262/2023 - STAY APPLICATION)

     Date : 25-09-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH


     For Petitioner(s)
                                       Mr. Parag P.Tripathi,Sr.Adv.
                                       Mr. Sreenivasan Ramaswami,Adv.
                                       Mr. Ravi Aggarwal,Adv.
                                       Mr. Ishaan Aggarwal,Adv.
                                       Mr. Vikas Kumar,Adv.
                                       Mr. Pranjal Shrivastava,Adv.
                                       Mr. Manish Paliwal,Adv.
                                       Mr. Arun Kumar,Adv.
                                       For M/S. Corporate Legal Partners, AOR

     For Respondent(s)
                                       Mr. Rafique A.Dada,Sr.Adv.
                                       Mr. Gurudatt R.Mallya,Adv.
                                       Ms. Anupama Dhurve,Adv.
                                       Mr. Sriram Krishna,Adv.
                                       For M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR

                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

Heard the learned senior appearing for the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2024.09.27 petitioners.

19:05:26 IST

Reason: 1 The challenge is to a decision of the High Court in an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the "Arbitration Act"). The dispute is about the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA), the first supplemental Share Purchase Agreement (SPA-1) and the second supplemental Share Purchase Agreement(SPA-2). The High Court in exercise of powers under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act has proceeded to set aside the Award made insofar Claim No.1 is concerned. Claim No.1 was pertaining to interest payable at the rate of 14 per cent per annum which was denied by the Arbitral Tribunal.

After having perused the relevant clauses of the three SPAs and after perusing the relevant paragraphs of the Arbitral Award, we concur with the view taken by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court that there is perversity in the findings arrived at by the Arbitral Tribunal by interpreting clauses 2 and 3 of SPA-2.

After having perused the relevant portions of the Award pointed out by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, we find that when it comes to consideration of clauses 2 and 3 of SPA-2, the perversity is writ large on the face of the Award. The finding regarding perversity has been clearly recorded in paragraphs 31 and 33 of the impugned judgment. 2 We do not think any other view was possible as regards the interpretation and meaning of clauses 2 and 3 of SPA-2. We, therefore find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

Pending application also stands disposed of.

(ANITA MALHOTRA)                                (AVGV RAMU)
   AR-CUM-PS                                   COURT MASTER




                                 3