Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Mallika vs The Chief Secretary on 13 March, 2018

Author: T.S.Sivagnanam

Bench: T.S.Sivagnanam, R.Tharani

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 13.03.2018  
CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM            
AND  
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI           

W.P.(MD).No.2687 of 2018  
and 
W.M.P.(MD).No.2862 of 2018   

S.Mallika                                                       ... Petitioner

                                                Vs.

1.The Chief Secretary,
   Revenue Department, 
   Fort St.George,
   Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Land Survey,
   Survey and Settlement Department,
   Land Survey House,
   Cheppak, Chennai-600 005. 

3.The District Collector,
   Tirunelveli District,
   Tirunelveli.

4.The Assistant Director (Land Survey)
   Tirunelveli.

5.The Tahsildar,
   Kadayanallur Taluk,
   Kadayanallur,
   Tirunelveli District.

6.The Block Development Officer,
   (Village Panchayat)
   Kasitharman, Kadayanallur Taluk,
   Tirunelveli District.

7.S.R.Ayyadurai                                         ... Respondents        

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to
rectifying the mistake of measurement mentioned in FMB in respect of
S.No.303/4, situated at Kasitharman Village, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli
District in consonance with FMB shown in respect of S.No.43, Kasitharman 
Village, Kadayanallur Taluk and further forbearing by considering the
petitioner's representation dateaad 18.09.2017 and further forbearing the 5th
respondent from taking action of removal of alleged encroachment in
S.No.303/4, Kasitharman Village, mentioned in the commissioner plan till
disposal of the representation dated 18.09.2017.

!For Petitioner : Mr.K.Esakki
^For R1 to R5   : Mr.D.Muruganandam   
                                                 Addl. Government Pleader 
                        For R6          : Mr.Karuppasamy Pandian  
                        For R7          : Mr.G.Karnan 
                        

:ORDER  

[Order of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Esakki, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.D.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5, Mr.Karuppasamy Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent and Mr.G.Karnan, learned counsel appearing for the 7th respondent.

2.The petitioner seeks for a direction to the fourth respondent to rectifying the mistake of measurement mentioned in FMB in respect of S.No.303/4, situated at Kasitharman Village, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli District in consonance with FMB shown in respect of S.No.43, Kasitharman Village, Kadayanallur Taluk and further forbearing by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.09.2017 and further forbearing the 5th respondent from taking action of removal of alleged encroachment in S.No.303/4, Kasitharman Village, mentioned in the commissioner plan.

3.We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner elaborately and took note of various orders passed in several writ petitions some of which have been filed by the petitioner and some filed by the 7th respondent. The photographs which have been produced before this Court clearly show that the petitioner has encroached into the Government property. Earlier, when the petitioner approached this Court alleging that proper survey was not conducted, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner and with the help of District Surveyor and the survey was to be conducted. Now, the petitioner seeks to dispute the correctness of the measurement in the sketch filed by the Advocate Commissioner. The survey was conducted in the presence of the petitioner and the petitioner's daughter appears to be the President of Panchayat. The photographs which have been produced before this Court show that the existing compound wall has been removed and the pillars have been erected virtually on the road, the construction has been done and new construction has now merged with the old existing house. Thus, the allegation that there is a mistake in the measurement mentioned in the field map book cannot be genuine one.

4.For the above reasons, the writ petition fails and stands dismissed. The petitioner is granted three weeks time to remove the encroachment, failing which, the respondent official shall remove the same and recover the cost from the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

To

1.The Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Land Survey, Survey and Settlement Department, Land Survey House, Cheppak, Chennai-600 005.

3.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

4.The Assistant Director (Land Survey) Tirunelveli.

5.The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Kadayanallur, Tirunelveli District.

6.The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat) Kasitharman, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

.