Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Assistent Engineer A.V.V.N.Ltd. vs Jayram S/O Jhadu Ram Gurjar on 10 November, 2015

  	 Daily Order 	   

 BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1

 

 

 

 

 

 FIRST APPEAL NO: 1293/2015

 

 

 

A.En. (O & M) Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Babai District Jhunjhunu.

 

 

 

Vs.

 

 

 

Jairam s/o Jhagruram Gurjar, r/o Modki Tan Papurna, Tehsil Khetri,Distt. Jhunjhunu

 

 

 

 

 

Date of Order 10.11.2015

 

 

 

Before:

 

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Nisha Gupta- President

 

Mr. Kailash Soyal -Member
 

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Sharma counsel for the appellant       2 BY THE STATE COMMISSION ( PER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NISHA GUPTA,PRESIDENT):

 
The appeal has been listed on application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act. Admittedly the District Forum has passed the judgment on 25.2.2015 and appeal has been filed with a delay of 213 days.
 
The contention of the appellant is that new office has been opened for the concerned area and hence delay has been occasioned but no reason has been assigned about the fact that when new office was started and why delay has been occasioned to file the appeal. Furthermore in application itself it has been narrated that on April 2015 the new office has been opened and admittedly till then the limitation for filing of the appeal was passed away. Hence, nothing has been explained that why delay has been occasioned to file the appeal and that too of 213 days.
 
Hence, there is no reason to allow this application. This application is dismissed as well as the appeal.
 
(Kailash Soyal) (Nisha Gupta ) Member President   nm