Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr.Prakash Varma vs Dr.Ing.H.C.F.Porsche Ag And Ors. on 23 April, 2009

  
 
 
 
 CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION



 

 


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
 


MAHARASHTRA STATE, MUMBAI
 


 
 


CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.143/2008            Date of filing : 22/09/2008
 


Date of order : 23/04/2009
 


Mr.Prakash Varma
 


R/o.279, V Main Road, Old Binnamanagala
 


I Stage Indiranagar
 


Bangalore 560 038                                        ..Complainant
 


v/s.
 


1. Dr.ING.H.C.F.Porsche AG
 


Porscheplatz I D-70435, Zuffenhausen Stuttgard
 


Germany, represented by its President 
 


And CEO Dr.Wende Lin Wiedeking
 


2. Porsche Centre Mumbai
 


Shreyans Motors Pvt.Ltd.
 


13 N.S.Patkar marg, Mumbai 400 007
 


represented by its Managing Director
 


Mr.Rod Wallace & CEO Mr.Ashish Chordia
 


3. Precision Cars India Pvt.Ltd.
 


3 III Floor, District Centre Jasola 
 


New Delhi 110 044
 


Represented by its Operations Manager
 


Mr.Allen Marriage                                        Opposite parties
 


 
 


          Corum: Shri P.N.Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member

            Smt.S.P.Lale, Honble Member Present : Mr.Amar Mishra-Advocate for the complainant. 

     Mr.S.A.Gundecha-Advocate for the O.Ps.

                                      O R A L    O R D E R   Per Shri P.N.Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member Heard Mr.Amar Mishra-Advocate for the complainant.  Mr.S.A.Gundecha-Advocate for the O.Ps.

We heard both the counsels extensively on the point of admission only.  We are finding that the customized car was booked by the complainant with O.P.nos.1, 2 & 3 and since as per terms and conditions of the said contract, the complainant had not made remaining amount of price, Car was not delivered and ultimately, complainant himself terminated the contract and he has simply filed this consumer complaint to get refund of Rs.66 lakhs paid earlier. 

There is no deficiency in service. He has terminated the contract and he has to recover Rs.66 lakhs from the O.Ps.  For this purpose he cannot file consumer complaint.  He has to approach Civil Court for getting decree passed against O.Ps. Hence we pass following order:-

                                                 ORDER
1.    

Complaint is rejected at the stage of admission itself.

2.     Pronounced and dictated in the open court.

3.     Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

                                  
(S.P.Lale)                                           (P.N.Kashalkar)
 

                              Member      
                             Presiding Judicial Member
 

 
 

Ms.