Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 8]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Sh. Gurcharan Singh vs Hrtc & Others on 16 May, 2015

Bench: Sanjay Karol, P.S. Rana

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
                                SHIMLA
                        CWP No.2538 of 2015-D
                        Date of Decision: 16.05.2015
    Sh. Gurcharan Singh                .........Petitioner.




                                                                                .

                                         Versus
    HRTC & others                                                  .....Respondents.





    Coram:
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1No.

    For the Petitioner:
                           r             Mr.

                                             toNaveen       Kumar
                                         Advocate, for the petitioner.

    For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for
                                                                       Dass,

                         respondents No.1 to 3.
    Sanjay Karol, J (oral)

In view of the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, reserving liberty to seek recourse to appropriate remedy in accordance with law, including filing a representation to appropriate authorities, bringing out the circumstances, under which, his case is allegedly covered by the judgment rendered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled as Nek Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, on 17.07.2014.

2. Liberty granted.

1

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:11:23 :::HCHP 2

3. As and when any such request is received, Court is hopeful that the appropriate authority shall take appropriate action expeditiously, in accordance .

with law, preferably within six weeks.

With the aforesaid observations, petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.

(Sanjay Karol), Judge.



                                               (P.S. Rana),

    May 16, 2015                                  Judge.

         (Purohit)








                                           ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:11:23 :::HCHP