Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 5]

Gujarat High Court

Inderpal Sureshkumar Yadav Thru Father ... vs Union Of India on 29 June, 2018

Author: Sonia Gokani

Bench: Sonia Gokani

       R/SCR.A/5016/2018                            ORDER




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

        R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5016 of 2018

==========================================================
  INDERPAL SURESHKUMAR YADAV THRU FATHER SURESHKUMAR
                      RAMKUMAR
                         Versus
                     UNION OF INDIA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JB DASTOOR(239) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 5
MS TRUSHA K PATEL(2434) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(3) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,4
NOTICE SERVED(4) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 3
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI

                           Date : 29/06/2018

                            ORAL ORDER

1. This   court   has   taken   the   matter   for   final  hearing   during   the   course   of   the   hearing.   The  issue   of   alternative   remedy   is   being   argued.  There are certain details which are needed to be  called   for.   On   raising   this   query,     learned  advocate   Ms.   Trusha   Patel,   appearing   for   the  respondent no.1 to 4 requests for sometime. While  permitting   her   time   till   05.07.2018,   this   court  notices that the applicant has already undergone  five   months   of   sentence   out   of   total   period   of  Page 1 of 4 R/SCR.A/5016/2018 ORDER one year. Exercising the powers, as usual in the  appeal   matters,   in   wake   of   the   decision   of  Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and others v. State of   Gujarat reported in (1999) 4 SCC 421, the Hon'ble  Court has held in para­3 as under:

"3.   When a convicted person is sentenced   to fixed period of sentence and when he files   appeal under any statutory right, suspension   of   sentence   can   be   considered   by   the   appellate   court   liberally   unless   there   are   exceptional circumstances. Of course if there   is   any   statutory   restriction   against   suspension   of   sentence   it   is   a   different   matter. Similarly, when the sentence is life   imprisonment the consideration for suspension   of sentence could be of a different approach.   But it for any reason the sentence of limited   duration cannot be suspended every endeavour   should   be   made   to   dispose   of   the   appeal   on   merits   more   so   when   motion   for   expeditious   hearing   the   appeal   is   made   in   such   cases.   Otherwise   the   very   valuable   right   of   appeal   would be an exercise in futility by efflux of   time. When the appellate court finds that due   to   practical   reasons   such   appeals   cannot   be   disposed of expeditiously the appellate court   must   bestow   special   concern   in   the   matter   suspending   the   sentence,   so   as   to   make   the   appeal   right   meaningful   and   effective.   Of   course   appellate   courts   can   impose   similar   conditions when bail is granted."

2. Till the issue of alternative remedy is decided  by   this   court,   the   powers   are   being   exercised   to  release   the   applicant   on   bail   on   his   executing   a  Page 2 of 4 R/SCR.A/5016/2018 ORDER solvent   surety   of   Rs.25,000/­   (Rupees   Twenty   Five  Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to  the   satisfaction   of   the   trial   Court   and   subject   to  the conditions that he shall:

[a]   not   take   undue   advantage   of   liberty   or  misuse liberty;
[b] not tamper  with the evidence  or hamper  the  prosecution   witnesses   and   shall   not   act   in   a  manner   injurious   to   the   interest   of   the  prosecution;
[c]   surrender   passport,   if   any,   to   the   trial  court   within   a   week   from   the   date   of   his  release;
[d]   not   leave   the   State   of   Gujarat,   without  prior permission of this Court;
[e]   mark   presence   before   the   concerned   Police  Station   between   11:00   a.m.   and   02:00   p.m.   on  every   first   and   third   Mondays   of   the   English  calendar month for a period of six months;
Page 3 of 4
R/SCR.A/5016/2018 ORDER [f] furnish the present address of his residence  to   (i)   the   Investigating   Officer   and   also   (ii)  the trial Court, at the time of execution of the  bond and shall not change the residence without  prior permission of this Court.

3. The authorities will release the applicant only  if   he   is   not   required   in   connection   with   any   other  offence for the time being.

4. If   breach   of   any   of   the   above   conditions   is  committed,   the   trial   Court   concerned   will   be   at  liberty  to issue warrant  or take appropriate  action  in the matter and even the Investigating Officer will  be   at   liberty   to   approach   this   Court   in   case   of  breach of any such condition.

5. Bail   bond   be   executed   before   the   trial   Court  having jurisdiction to try the case. 

 

Direct service is permitted.

Matter to appear on board on 05.07.2018.

(SONIA GOKANI, J) pradhyuman Page 4 of 4