Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gaganpreet Kaur And Another vs State Of Ut Chandigarh And Others on 2 August, 2022

Author: Sureshwar Thakur

Bench: Sureshwar Thakur

108
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH
                                                 CRWP-7379-2022
                                                 Date of decision:02.08.2022

GAGANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER                                 ...Petitioners
                                        Versus

STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS                           ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR


Present:     Mr. Madan Bhandari, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

             Mr. Ankur Bali,, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh
                   ****

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to give protection to the life, and liberty, of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents No. 4 to 8.

2. The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-5.

3. Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-5, through a speaking order.

4. Petition is disposed of.

5. However, the afore order is subject to the condition that, upon the investigating officer, discovering credible evidence, with respect to the age of the co-petitioner Gaganpreet Kaur, and, in case from the birth 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 03-08-2022 23:14:27 ::: CRWP-7379-2022 (O&M) -2- certificate concerned, it is clear that she is below 18 years, thereupon, upon, a complaint being filed by the father of the afore, it is open for the investigating officer concerned, to draw an appropriate action, against the accused, but in accordance with law. Nonetheless, he may not arrest him without issuing seven days notice upon him.

6. A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

August 02, 2022                                   ( SURESHWAR THAKUR )
'Ithlesh'                                               JUDGE

            Whether Speaking/reasoned                  Yes/No
            Whether Reportable                         Yes/No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 03-08-2022 23:14:27 :::