Kerala High Court
K.G.Krishnakumar vs Vijayalakshmi Pillai on 20 June, 2012
Author: V. Chitambaresh
Bench: V.Chitambaresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/30TH JYAISHTA 1934
OP(C).No. 1919 of 2012 (O)
--------------------------
OS.311/2011 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER(S)/DEFENDANT :
------------------------
K.G.KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED 34 YEARS
S/O. GOPINATHA PILLAI, KUTTIYIL, PADEETTATHIL
EREZHA NORTH, CHETTIKULANGARA.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
SRI.R.REJI
SMT.THARA THAMBAN
SRI.B.BIPIN
RESPONDENT(S)/COUNTER PETITIONER :
----------------------------------
VIJAYALAKSHMI PILLAI, AGED 43 YEARS
D/O. BHARATHI PILLAI, VARAVUKALAYIL
KOIPALLYKARAZHMA MURI, PERINGALA VILLAGE
NOW RESIDING AT KRISHNARIPA, PATHIYOOR EAST
KEERIKADU P.O., PIN-690 508.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-06-2012, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO. 1919/2012
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION (INDIGENT)NO.15/2008.
EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION PERMITTING TO SUE AS INDIGENT
PERSON VIDE IA NO.1799/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE SUB
COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO IA NO.1799/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE
HON'BLE SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF EXTRACT OF THE THANDAPPER REGISTER VIDE
THANDAPER NO.9627 OF THEKKEKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK.
EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATES FOR THE PERIOD
FROM 1.1.1992 TO 30.3.2012 IN RESPECT OF PROPERTIES LYING IN
SURVEY NO.337/6B, RE-SURVEY NO.407/11/3, SURVEY NO.237/6B, SURVEY
NO.407/11, SURVEY NO.237/6B, SURVEY NO.8/B2/17, SURVEY NO.237/7B
AND RESURVEY NO.407/2 OF THEKKEKKARA VILLAGE.
EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.12.12.2011 IN OP(PAUPER)NO.15/2008.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
--------------------------------
OP(C) NO. 1919 OF 2012
------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of June, 2012
JUDGMENT
The court below has by the order impugned permitted the respondent/plaintiff to sue as an indigent person under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner/defendant contends that the respondent did not state the particulars of the assets held by her in the application and that she had wilfully transferred property in favour of her near relatives.
2. It is open to the petitioner to move for dis- paupering the respondent by bringing these facts to the notice of the court below under Order XXXIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court below shall hear all the parties and pass a considered order on motion if any made by the petitioner in that regard.
The order of the court below is affirmed subject to the above reservation. The Original Petition is disposed of as above.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd