Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Kathayee Cotton Mills Ltd vs The Asst. Executive Engineer on 26 October, 2006

       

  

  

 
 
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

               MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/7TH KARTHIKA 1934

                                WP(C).No. 9498 of 2008 (E)
                                    --------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

             KATHAYEE COTTON MILLS LTD.,
             WARD NO.XI, PERUMBAVOOR ROAD, ALUVA
             REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, V.S.GOPALAKRISHNAN.

             BY ADVS.SRI.P.S.PRADEEP
                     SRIM.K.SASEENDRAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
             KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALUVA.

          2. THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR,
             REVENUE RECOVERY, ALUVA.

          3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
             THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

              BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMBIL
              BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
              BY SRI.M.DINESH,

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-
          10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 9498 of 2008



                        APPENDIX


EXHIBITS


P1-   TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT DATED 26.10.2006

P2-   TRUE COPY OF THE R.R.DEMAND NOTICE DATED 13.8.2007



                        /true copy/



                        P.A. To Judge



                   ANTONY DOMINIC, J
                  ........................................
                       W.P.(C).9498/2008
                ..............................................
          Dated this the 29th day of October, 2012

                            JUDGMENT

It is submitted that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the dispute between the parties have been settled and the Managing Director has issued proceedings dated 28.9.2012.

Now that even according to the respondents, the amount due have all been deposited by the petitioner, revenue recovery proceedings initiated as per Ext.P2 is quashed and the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.





                         Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

mrcs


                         /true copy/           PA To Judge